From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from kirsty.vergenet.net ([202.4.237.240]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1OZEnk-0003wA-9O for kexec@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 15 Jul 2010 03:07:58 +0000 Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 12:07:48 +0900 From: Simon Horman Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix case where phys_addr_t != unsigned long when reading proc entries Message-ID: <20100715030748.GA11508@verge.net.au> References: <1279121556-8069-1-git-send-email-msm@freescale.com> <1279121958.13098.1.camel@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1279121958.13098.1.camel@localhost> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: kexec-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: kexec-bounces+dwmw2=infradead.org@lists.infradead.org To: Matthew McClintock Cc: kexec@lists.infradead.org On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 10:39:18AM -0500, Matthew McClintock wrote: > On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 10:32 -0500, Matthew McClintock wrote: > > On some actitectures the physical memory can be 64 bits, therefore > > the code that reads proc entries needs to take into account it could > > read either a 32 bit or 64bit value for the physical addresses. > > > > These patches did not get numbered, shall I resubmit with numbered > patches? The list below is sufficient, but could you cc the patches to linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org? > 0001-Fix-case-where-phys_addr_t-unsigned-long-when-rea.patch > 0002-Update-uImage-to-support-crash-kernel-and-misc-fixes.patch > 0003-Update-Elf-ppc-to-support-crash-kernel-and-misc-fixe.patch > 0004-Add-support-for-ramdisk-on-ppc32-for-uImage-ppc-and.patch > 0005-Add-support-for-reworking-flat-device-tree-support.patch _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec