public inbox for kexec@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
To: Michael Holzheu <holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: oomichi@mxs.nes.nec.co.jp, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	mahesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hbabu@us.ibm.com,
	horms@verge.net.au, ebiederm@xmission.com,
	schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, kexec@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [patch v2 02/10] kdump: Make kimage_load_crash_segment() weak
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2011 16:31:43 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110801203143.GH3805@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110727125807.695225427@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 02:55:06PM +0200, Michael Holzheu wrote:
> From: Michael Holzheu <holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> 
> On s390 we do not create page tables at all for the crashkernel memory.
> This requires a s390 specific version for kimage_load_crash_segment().
> Therefore this patch declares this function as "__weak". The s390 version is
> very simple. It just copies the kexec segment to real memory without using
> page tables:
> 
> int kimage_load_crash_segment(struct kimage *image,
>                               struct kexec_segment *segment)
> {
>         return copy_from_user_real((void *) segment->mem, segment->buf,
>                                    segment->bufsz);
> }
> 
> There are two main advantages of not creating page tables for the
> crashkernel memory:
> 
> a) It saves memory. We have scenarios in mind, where crashkernel
>    memory can be very large and saving page table space is important.
> b) We protect the crashkernel memory from being overwritten.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Michael Holzheu <holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>  kernel/kexec.c |    4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> --- a/kernel/kexec.c
> +++ b/kernel/kexec.c
> @@ -842,8 +842,8 @@ out:
>  	return result;
>  }
>  
> -static int kimage_load_crash_segment(struct kimage *image,
> -					struct kexec_segment *segment)
> +int __weak kimage_load_crash_segment(struct kimage *image,
> +				     struct kexec_segment *segment)

A comment here why we are making it weak should help in increasing
the code readability.

Thanks
Vivek

>  {
>  	/* For crash dumps kernels we simply copy the data from
>  	 * user space to it's destination.

_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec

  reply	other threads:[~2011-08-01 20:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-07-27 12:55 [patch v2 00/10] kdump: Patch series for s390 support (version 2) Michael Holzheu
2011-07-27 12:55 ` [patch v2 01/10] kdump: Add KEXEC_CRASH_CONTROL_MEMORY_LIMIT Michael Holzheu
2011-08-01 20:16   ` Vivek Goyal
2011-08-02  9:51     ` Michael Holzheu
2011-08-02 19:16       ` Vivek Goyal
2011-08-03  9:27         ` Michael Holzheu
2011-07-27 12:55 ` [patch v2 02/10] kdump: Make kimage_load_crash_segment() weak Michael Holzheu
2011-08-01 20:31   ` Vivek Goyal [this message]
2011-08-02  9:30     ` Michael Holzheu
2011-08-02 18:55       ` Vivek Goyal
2011-08-03 10:41         ` Michael Holzheu
2011-08-04 20:25           ` Vivek Goyal
2011-07-27 12:55 ` [patch v2 03/10] kdump: Add size to elfcorehdr kernel parameter Michael Holzheu
2011-08-01 20:36   ` Vivek Goyal
2011-08-02  9:08     ` Michael Holzheu
2011-08-02 18:55       ` Vivek Goyal
2011-08-03 10:40         ` Michael Holzheu
2011-07-27 12:55 ` [patch v2 04/10] kdump: Trigger kdump via panic notifier chain on s390 Michael Holzheu
2011-08-01 20:41   ` Vivek Goyal
2011-08-02  8:37     ` Michael Holzheu
2011-08-02 19:21       ` Vivek Goyal
2011-08-03  9:50         ` Michael Holzheu
2011-08-04 21:14           ` Vivek Goyal
2011-08-08 17:47             ` Michael Holzheu
2011-08-09 21:19               ` Vivek Goyal
2011-07-27 12:55 ` [patch v2 05/10] s390: Add PSW restart shutdown trigger Michael Holzheu
2011-08-01 20:54   ` Vivek Goyal
2011-08-02  8:05     ` Michael Holzheu
2011-07-27 12:55 ` [patch v2 06/10] s390: Export store_status() function Michael Holzheu
2011-07-27 12:55 ` [patch v2 07/10] s390: Use diagnose 308 for system reset Michael Holzheu
2011-07-27 12:55 ` [patch v2 08/10] s390: Add real memory access functions Michael Holzheu
2011-07-27 12:55 ` [patch v2 09/10] s390: kdump backend code Michael Holzheu
2011-07-27 12:55 ` [patch v2 10/10] kexec-tools: Add s390 kdump support Michael Holzheu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110801203143.GH3805@redhat.com \
    --to=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=hbabu@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=horms@verge.net.au \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mahesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=oomichi@mxs.nes.nec.co.jp \
    --cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox