From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-yx0-f177.google.com ([209.85.213.177]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1RQ53N-0008QN-9c for kexec@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 22:31:01 +0000 Received: by yenl9 with SMTP id l9so6816980yen.36 for ; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 14:31:00 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 09:00:38 +1030 From: Alan Modra Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] kexec-tools: powerpc: Fix 64bit optimize for size (gcc -Os) build Message-ID: <20111114223036.GK14325@bubble.grove.modra.org> References: <20111114185329.19ddc2b4@kryten> <20111114221402.GJ14325@bubble.grove.modra.org> <20111115092406.31df5f9e@kryten> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20111115092406.31df5f9e@kryten> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: kexec-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: kexec-bounces+dwmw2=infradead.org@lists.infradead.org To: Anton Blanchard Cc: Michael Neuling , Simon Horman , kexec@lists.infradead.org, Milton Miller , Matt Evans On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 09:24:06AM +1100, Anton Blanchard wrote: > I wonder why we aren't building and linking an -fpic object, wouldn't > it make the relocation code much simpler? No, powerpc64 is PIC anyway. -- Alan Modra Australia Development Lab, IBM _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec