From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from kirsty.vergenet.net ([2406:a000:f000:9500::1]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1RRDyg-0001QG-BX for kexec@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 02:14:56 +0000 Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 08:48:29 +0900 From: Simon Horman Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] kexec-tools: powerpc: Fix 64bit optimize for size (gcc -Os) build Message-ID: <20111117234829.GA14082@verge.net.au> References: <20111114185329.19ddc2b4@kryten> <20111114221402.GJ14325@bubble.grove.modra.org> <20111115092406.31df5f9e@kryten> <20111114223036.GK14325@bubble.grove.modra.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20111114223036.GK14325@bubble.grove.modra.org> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: kexec-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: kexec-bounces+dwmw2=infradead.org@lists.infradead.org To: Alan Modra Cc: Milton Miller , Michael Neuling , kexec@lists.infradead.org, Anton Blanchard , Matt Evans On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 09:00:38AM +1030, Alan Modra wrote: > On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 09:24:06AM +1100, Anton Blanchard wrote: > > I wonder why we aren't building and linking an -fpic object, wouldn't > > it make the relocation code much simpler? > > No, powerpc64 is PIC anyway. Hi Alan, Hi Anton, Hi all, I am wondering if you are comfortable with me (finally) releasing a new version of kexec-tools with this series of patches applied. _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec