From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1RSyak-0000pk-Ns for kexec@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 22:13:27 +0000 Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 17:13:21 -0500 From: Mike Snitzer Subject: Re: block: initialize request_queue's numa node during allocation Message-ID: <20111122221320.GB17543@redhat.com> References: <4ECB5C80.8080609@redhat.com> <20111122152739.GA5663@redhat.com> <20111122211954.GA17120@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: kexec-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: kexec-bounces+dwmw2=infradead.org@lists.infradead.org To: David Rientjes Cc: Jens Axboe , kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Dave Young , Vivek Goyal On Tue, Nov 22 2011 at 4:45pm -0500, David Rientjes wrote: > Also, your changelog is inadequate since it doesn't convey that his should > be merged for 3.2 because it fixes an oops when there is no node 0! Also, this isn't new to 3.2, v2 should Cc: stable@kernel.org _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec