From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-vw0-f49.google.com ([209.85.212.49]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1RTFbB-0001KD-O7 for kexec@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 23 Nov 2011 16:23:03 +0000 Received: by vbbfs19 with SMTP id fs19so1796302vbb.36 for ; Wed, 23 Nov 2011 08:23:00 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 08:22:54 -0800 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [PATCH] percpu: add comment to per_cpu_ptr_to_phys Message-ID: <20111123162254.GD25780@google.com> References: <20111123084543.GA2923@darkstar.nay.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20111123084543.GA2923@darkstar.nay.redhat.com> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: kexec-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: kexec-bounces+dwmw2=infradead.org@lists.infradead.org To: Dave Young Cc: xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com, kexec@lists.infradead.org, tim@edgecast.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello, On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 04:45:43PM +0800, Dave Young wrote: > add comments about current per_cpu_ptr_to_phys implementation > to explain why the logic is more complicated than necessary. > > Signed-off-by: Dave Young Moved the comment into the kerneldoc comment and applied to percpu/for-3.2-fixes. Thank you very much. -- tejun _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec