public inbox for kexec@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>
To: Atsushi Kumagai <kumagai-atsushi@mxc.nes.nec.co.jp>
Cc: oomichi@mxs.nes.nec.co.jp, d.hatayama@jp.fujitsu.com,
	kexec@lists.infradead.org, vgoyal@redhat.com
Subject: Re: makedumpfile memory usage grows with system memory size
Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 08:35:38 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120515123538.GR32472@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120515145705.d6daeb68.kumagai-atsushi@mxc.nes.nec.co.jp>

On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 02:57:05PM +0900, Atsushi Kumagai wrote:
> Hello Don,
> 
> On Fri, 11 May 2012 09:26:01 -0400
> Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> > > Thank you for your reply, Don, Vivek.
> > > 
> > > As Don said, I tried to change the method to exclude free pages and
> > > planed to resolve the memory consumption issue after it, because
> > > parsing free list repeatedly may cause a performance issue.
> > > 
> > > However, I'm thinking that to fix the size of memory consumption is more
> > > important than to resolve a performance issue for large system.
> > > 
> > > So I'm afraid that I would like to change the plan as:
> > > 
> > >   1. Implement "iterating filtering processing" to fix the size of memory
> > >      consumption. At this stage, makedumpfile will parse free list repeatedly
> > >      even though it may cause a performance issue.
> > >      
> > >   2. Take care of the performance issue after the 1st step.
> > 
> > Hello Atsushi-san,
> > 
> > Hmm.  The problem with the free list is that the addresses are in random
> > order, hence the reason to parse it repeatedly, correct?
> 
> Yes.
> 
> > I figured, now that you have a solution to parse the addresses in a linear
> > way (the changes you made a couple of weeks ago), you would just continue
> > with that.  With that complete, we can look at the performance issues and
> > solve them then.
> > 
> > But it is up to you.  You are willing to do the work, so I will defer to
> > your judgement on how best to proceed. :-)
> 
> What I wanted to tell you was I want to resolve the memory consumption issue
> as soon as possible. In other words, I think the method to exclude free pages
> is not so important.
> I'll continue to work with the method which is easy to implement.

Ok.  I look forward to your results.  Thanks for your effort.

Cheers,
Don

_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec

  reply	other threads:[~2012-05-15 12:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-03-28 21:22 makedumpfile memory usage grows with system memory size Don Zickus
2012-03-29  8:09 ` Ken'ichi Ohmichi
2012-03-29 12:56   ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2012-03-29 13:25     ` Don Zickus
2012-03-30  0:51       ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2012-04-02  7:46         ` Atsushi Kumagai
2012-04-05  6:52           ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2012-04-05 14:34             ` Vivek Goyal
2012-04-06  1:12               ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2012-04-06  8:59                 ` Atsushi Kumagai
2012-04-06  9:29                   ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2012-04-09 18:57                     ` Vivek Goyal
2012-04-09 23:58                       ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2012-04-10 12:52                         ` Vivek Goyal
2012-04-12  3:40                           ` Atsushi Kumagai
2012-04-12  7:47                             ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
     [not found]                               ` <20120427164649.9932a33f.kumagai-atsushi@mxc.nes.nec.co.jp>
2012-04-27 12:52                                 ` Don Zickus
2012-05-11  1:19                                   ` Atsushi Kumagai
2012-05-11 13:26                                     ` Don Zickus
2012-05-15  5:57                                       ` Atsushi Kumagai
2012-05-15 12:35                                         ` Don Zickus [this message]
2012-04-27 13:33                                 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-05-14  5:44                                 ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2012-05-16  8:02                                   ` Atsushi Kumagai
2012-05-17  0:21                                     ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2012-04-09 19:00                 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-03-29 13:05   ` Don Zickus
2012-03-30  9:43     ` Atsushi Kumagai
2012-03-30 13:19       ` Don Zickus
2012-04-02 17:15   ` Michael Holzheu
2012-04-06  8:09     ` Atsushi Kumagai
2012-04-11  8:04       ` Michael Holzheu
2012-04-12  8:49         ` Atsushi Kumagai
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-04-02  6:53 tachibana

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120515123538.GR32472@redhat.com \
    --to=dzickus@redhat.com \
    --cc=d.hatayama@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=kumagai-atsushi@mxc.nes.nec.co.jp \
    --cc=oomichi@mxs.nes.nec.co.jp \
    --cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox