kexec.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
To: Takao Indoh <indou.takao@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: rjw@sisk.pl, amwang@redhat.com, tiwai@suse.de,
	kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	yinghai.lu@oracle.com, hpa@zytor.com, xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, dyoung@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: revert "x86: Fix S4 regression"
Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2012 16:42:45 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120806204245.GI25559@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <500F3B7C.70009@jp.fujitsu.com>

On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 09:19:08AM +0900, Takao Indoh wrote:
> (2012/07/25 0:55), Cong Wang wrote:
> >On Mon, 2012-07-23 at 20:22 +0900, Takao Indoh wrote:
> >>(2012/07/23 19:00), Dave Young wrote:
> >>>On 07/17/2012 11:15 AM, Takao Indoh wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>Hi Cong,
> >>>>
> >>>>When I tested kdump with 3.5.0-rc6 kernel, I found a problem of kdump
> >>>>kernel's panic in find_early_table_space().
> >>>>
> >>>>init_memory_mapping: [mem 0x00000000-0x36ffafff]
> >>>>Kernel panic - not syncing: Cannot find space for the kernel page tables
> >>>>Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 3.5.0-rc6 #17
> >>>>Call Trace:
> >>>>   [<ffffffff8158549b>] panic+0xb8/0x1c8
> >>>>   [<ffffffff8158565d>] ? printk+0x48/0x4a
> >>>>   [<ffffffff8157304c>] init_memory_mapping+0x46c/0x530
> >>>>   [<ffffffff818a73c7>] setup_arch+0x669/0xb0e
> >>>>   [<ffffffff8158565d>] ? printk+0x48/0x4a
> >>>>   [<ffffffff818a3a1f>] start_kernel+0x9b/0x34a
> >>>>   [<ffffffff818a332d>] x86_64_start_reservations+0x131/0x136
> >>>>   [<ffffffff818a341f>] x86_64_start_kernel+0xed/0xf4
> >>>>
> >>>>In find_early_table_space(), a kernel tries to find free area below 512M
> >>>>for pgtable using memblock_find_in_range, but it fails because kdump
> >>>>kernel does not have enough free space below 512M due to the memmap
> >>>>restriction. This is the memmap option specified against kdump kernel
> >>>>when crashkernel=128M.
> >>>>
> >>>>memmap=560K@64K memmap=130492K@770608K
> >>>>
> >>>>Only 560KB area is available and it is not sufficient for pgtable (it
> >>>>seems that about 1.8MB area is needed for pgtable). This problem is
> >>>>fixed by your revert patch. I hope this patch gets merged.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>I can reproduce this issue as well, probably related to some x86 mm init
> >>>commits, this alloc failure does not happen with reverting below commits:
> >>>
> >>>bd2753b2dda7bb43c7468826de75f49c6a7e8965
> >>>722bc6b16771ed80871e1fd81c86d3627dda2ac8
> >>Yeah, my result of bisect is as follows and at first I thought the
> >>commit 722bc6 caused this regression.
> >>
> >>722bc6b16771ed80871e1fd81c86d3627dda2ac8 is the first bad commit
> >>commit 722bc6b16771ed80871e1fd81c86d3627dda2ac8
> >>Author: WANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
> >>Date:   Mon Mar 5 15:05:13 2012 -0800
> >>
> >>IIUC, this commit just fixes a bug of counting pgtable entries. As the
> >>result, another problem came up to the surface. In the case of my
> >>machine(16GB memory), before applying 722bc6, find_early_table_space()
> >>requests about 12KB free area and it can be got from 560K@64K area
> >>luckily. I think the size find_early_table_space() requests was a bug.
> >>After the bug is fixed by the commit 722bc6, find_early_table_space()
> >>requires 1.8MB area and it fails as I wrote.
> >
> >Thanks for tracking this, Takao!
> >
> >I bet you are using x86_64 not x86 PAE? If so, could you try this patch
> >https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1195751/
> >? I already reviewed it.
> 
> Great, I applied it and now kdump works. Thanks!

Did something happen on this patch. We definitely want to gain back the
capability to be able to reserve 512MB of kdump memory.

Thanks
Vivek

_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec

  reply	other threads:[~2012-08-06 20:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1339478463-31172-1-git-send-email-amwang@redhat.com>
     [not found] ` <5004D8BF.6050205@jp.fujitsu.com>
     [not found]   ` <500D20A1.1030800@redhat.com>
2012-07-23 11:22     ` [PATCH] x86: revert "x86: Fix S4 regression" Takao Indoh
2012-07-23 12:51       ` Dave Young
2012-07-24 15:55       ` Cong Wang
2012-07-25  0:19         ` Takao Indoh
2012-08-06 20:42           ` Vivek Goyal [this message]
2012-08-06 21:55             ` Yinghai Lu
2012-08-11 17:57           ` Jerry Snitselaar
2012-08-11 18:26             ` Jerry Snitselaar
2012-08-11 18:34               ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-08-11 18:39                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-08-11 19:33                 ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120806204245.GI25559@redhat.com \
    --to=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=amwang@redhat.com \
    --cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=indou.takao@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=tiwai@suse.de \
    --cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
    --cc=yinghai.lu@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).