From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1TgkGs-0003od-Nj for kexec@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 06 Dec 2012 22:50:23 +0000 Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2012 14:50:20 -0800 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/8] remove vm_struct list management Message-Id: <20121206145020.93fd7128.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <1354810175-4338-1-git-send-email-js1304@gmail.com> References: <1354810175-4338-1-git-send-email-js1304@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: kexec-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: kexec-bounces+dwmw2=infradead.org@lists.infradead.org To: Joonsoo Kim Cc: Russell King , kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Vivek Goyal , linux-mm@kvack.org On Fri, 7 Dec 2012 01:09:27 +0900 Joonsoo Kim wrote: > I'm not sure that "7/8: makes vmlist only for kexec" is fine. > Because it is related to userspace program. > As far as I know, makedumpfile use kexec's output information and it only > need first address of vmalloc layer. So my implementation reflect this > fact, but I'm not sure. And now, I don't fully test this patchset. > Basic operation work well, but I don't test kexec. So I send this > patchset with 'RFC'. Yes, this is irritating. Perhaps Vivek or one of the other kexec people could take a look at this please - if would obviously be much better if we can avoid merging [patch 7/8] at all. _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec