From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from kirsty.vergenet.net ([202.4.237.240]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1UCguV-0005oo-Ks for kexec@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 05 Mar 2013 01:43:20 +0000 Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2013 10:43:16 +0900 From: Simon Horman Subject: Re: kexec,x86: Use macro CRASH_MAX_MEMMAP_NR for clarification Message-ID: <20130305014316.GF16128@verge.net.au> References: <512C8AA6.2020503@cn.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <512C8AA6.2020503@cn.fujitsu.com> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "kexec" Errors-To: kexec-bounces+dwmw2=infradead.org@lists.infradead.org To: Zhang Yanfei Cc: HATAYAMA Daisuke , "kexec@lists.infradead.org" On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 06:12:54PM +0800, Zhang Yanfei wrote: > For the allocation, using CRASH_MAX_MEMMAP_NR instead of KEXEC_MAX_SEGMENTS + 1 > seems more understandable. Thanks, applied. _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec