From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
To: Cliff Wickman <cpw@sgi.com>
Cc: kumagai-atsushi@mxc.nes.nec.co.jp, d.hatayama@jp.fujitsu.com,
kexec@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: makedumpfile 1.5.4, 734G kdump tests
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 09:06:47 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130711130647.GA20962@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130709162403.GA25441@sgi.com>
On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 11:24:03AM -0500, Cliff Wickman wrote:
[..]
> UV2000 memory: 734G
> makedumpfile: makedumpfile-1.5.4
> kexec: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/utils/kernel/kexec/kexec-tools.git
> booted with crashkernel=1G,high crashkernel=192M,low
> non-cyclic mode
>
> write to option init&scan sec. copy sec. dump size
> ------------- ----------------- ---- --------- ---------
> megaraid disk no compression 19 91 11.7G
> megaraid disk zlib compression 20 209 1.4G
> megaraid disk snappy compression 20 46 2.4G
> megaraid disk snappy compression no mmap 30 72 2.4G
> /dev/null no compression 19 28 -
> /dev/null zlib compression 19 206 -
> /dev/null snappy compression 19 41 -
>
> Notes and observations
> - Snappy compression is a big win over zlib compression; over 4 times faster
> with a cost of relatively little disk space.
Thanks for the results Cliff. If it is not too much of trouble, can you
please also test with lzo compression on same configuration. I am
curious to know how much better snappy performs as compared to lzo.
Thanks
Vivek
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-11 13:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-09 16:24 makedumpfile 1.5.4, 734G kdump tests Cliff Wickman
[not found] ` <CAJGZr0JPrBB3cVyVdwJdd6cEUfnXNMuRijb9EOoSy+XmRupv7A@mail.gmail.com>
2013-07-10 9:07 ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
[not found] ` <CAJGZr0L7GBqJHaPzgpFxhpF_jmAZfDJYU_=MFxATxnLk13ni4g@mail.gmail.com>
2013-07-10 18:27 ` Cliff Wickman
2013-07-11 13:06 ` Vivek Goyal [this message]
2013-07-12 16:14 ` Cliff Wickman
2013-07-12 16:42 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-07-16 9:22 ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-07-16 14:15 ` Vivek Goyal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130711130647.GA20962@redhat.com \
--to=vgoyal@redhat.com \
--cc=cpw@sgi.com \
--cc=d.hatayama@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=kumagai-atsushi@mxc.nes.nec.co.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox