From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from kirsty.vergenet.net ([202.4.237.240]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1Vdahm-0000T6-3I for kexec@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 05 Nov 2013 07:05:38 +0000 Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2013 16:05:13 +0900 From: Simon Horman Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] kexec support for Linux/m68k (tools part) Message-ID: <20131105070513.GB16448@verge.net.au> References: <1381859460-13645-1-git-send-email-geert@linux-m68k.org> <20131016072236.GB29696@verge.net.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "kexec" Errors-To: kexec-bounces+dwmw2=twosheds.infradead.org@lists.infradead.org To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: linux-m68k , kexec@lists.infradead.org On Sun, Nov 03, 2013 at 03:08:50PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 9:22 AM, Simon Horman wrote: > > I've taken a quick look over this and it seems reasonable to me. > > Thanks! > > > However, I wonder if I should wait for review of the kernel-side > > to be completed before applying the kexec-tools patches. > > > > Let me know what you think. > > The kexec-tools part seems to be stable. The issues to be sorted out are on > the kernel side. > > However, it doesn't hurt to wait a little bit more to apply this. We m68k > people are patient and used to multi-year development ;-) It is said that patience is a virtue :^) As the kexec-tools portion of this change isn't useful without the kernel portion I think I would like to wait before applying this series. Please repost once the kernel changes have been merged or if you would like them re-considered for any other reason. _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec