From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1VhKM5-0000mw-Ik for kexec@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 14:26:42 +0000 Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 09:26:17 -0500 From: Vivek Goyal Subject: Re: /proc/vmcore mmap() failure issue Message-ID: <20131115142617.GC6637@redhat.com> References: <20131113204130.GD7613@redhat.com> <5284A689.70903@jp.fujitsu.com> <20131114151359.GA3913@redhat.com> <5285EC60.1060906@jp.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5285EC60.1060906@jp.fujitsu.com> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "kexec" Errors-To: kexec-bounces+dwmw2=twosheds.infradead.org@lists.infradead.org To: HATAYAMA Daisuke Cc: Baoquan He , Kexec Mailing List , linux kernel mailing list , Atsushi Kumagai , "Eric W. Biederman" , Dave Young , WANG Chao On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 06:41:52PM +0900, HATAYAMA Daisuke wrote: [..] > >Given the fact that hpa does not like fixing it in kernel. We are left > >with option of fixing it in following places. > > > >- Drop partial pages in kexec-tools > >- Drop partial pages in makeudmpfile. > >- Read partial pages using read() interface in makedumpfile > >- Modify /proc/vmcore to copy partial pages in second kernel's memory. > > > >It is not clear to me that partial pages are really useful. So I want > >to avoid modifying /proc/vmcore to deal with partial pages and increase > >complexity. > > > >So fixing makedumpfile (either option2 or option 3) seems least risky > >to me. In fact I would say let us keep it simple and truncate partial > >pages in makedumpfile to keep it simple. And look at option 3 once we > >have a strong use case for partial pages. > > > >What do you think? > > > > As you say, it's not clear that partial pages are really useful, but on > the other hand, it seems to me not clear that they are really useless. > I think we should get them as long as we have access to them. > > It seems best to me the option 3). Switching between read and mmap would > be not so complex and also it's by far flexible in makedumpfile than in > kernel. Ok, I am fine with option 3. It is more complicated option but safe option. Is there any chance that you could look into fixing this. I have no experience writing code for makedumpfile. Thanks Vivek _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec