From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([2a01:4f8:120:8448::d00d]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1VkD3m-0005E9-T2 for kexec@lists.infradead.org; Sat, 23 Nov 2013 13:15:43 +0000 Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2013 14:15:18 +0100 From: Borislav Petkov Subject: Re: [patch 5/9 v3] efi: export more efi table variable to sysfs Message-ID: <20131123131518.GC24148@pd.tnic> References: <20131121061704.363730447@dhcp-16-126.nay.redhat.com> <20131121061754.887381332@dhcp-16-126.nay.redhat.com> <20131121165742.GN26009@pd.tnic> <20131122024850.GC3874@dhcp-16-126.nay.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20131122024850.GC3874@dhcp-16-126.nay.redhat.com> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "kexec" Errors-To: kexec-bounces+dwmw2=twosheds.infradead.org@lists.infradead.org To: Dave Young Cc: mjg59@srcf.ucam.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, toshi.kani@hp.com, matt@console-pimps.org, greg@kroah.com, x86@kernel.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com, horms@verge.net.au, ebiederm@xmission.com, hpa@zytor.com, vgoyal@redhat.com On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 10:48:50AM +0800, Dave Young wrote: > > efi.config_table = (unsigned long)efi.systab->tables; > > efi.fw_vendor = (unsigned long)efi.systab->fw_vendor; > > efi.runtime = (unsigned long)efi.systab->runtime; > > Hmm, UEFI spec mentions the them like below so I use the order: I'm sure by now you know you should not really trust the UEFI spec, or any other spec for that matter :) > Several fields of the EFI System Table must be converted from > physical pointers to virtual pointers using the ConvertPointer() > service. These fields include FirmwareVendor, RuntimeServices, > and ConfigurationTable. > > But since you like the reverse I can change it in next version. The reverse was simply a suggestion. The vertical alignment was more what I aimed at because it makes this chunk much more readable IMO. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine. -- _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec