kexec.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Cc: mjg59@srcf.ucam.org, greg@kroah.com, kexec@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ebiederm@xmission.com,
	hpa@zytor.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] kexec: A new system call to allow in kernel loading
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2013 21:23:03 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131203132303.GA3826@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1384969851-7251-1-git-send-email-vgoyal@redhat.com>

Tested kdump and kexec using --use-kexec2-syscall on kenrel 3.13.0-rc2+,
they work very well.


On 11/20/13 at 12:50pm, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> Current proposed secureboot implementation disables kexec/kdump because
> it can allow unsigned kernel to run on a secureboot platform. Intial
> idea was to sign /sbin/kexec binary and let that binary do the kernel
> signature verification. I had posted RFC patches for this apparoach
> here.
> 
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/9/10/560
> 
> Later we had discussion at Plumbers and most of the people thought
> that signing and trusting /sbin/kexec is becoming complex. So a 
> better idea might be let kernel do the signature verification of
> new kernel being loaded. This calls for implementing a new system call
> and moving lot of user space code in kernel.
> 
> kexec_load() system call allows loading a kexec/kdump kernel and jump
> to that kernel at right time. Though a lot of processing is done in
> user space which prepares a list of segments/buffers to be loaded and
> kexec_load() works on that list of segments. It does not know what's
> contained in those segments.
> 
> Now a new system call kexec_file_load() is implemented which takes
> kernel fd and initrd fd as parameters. Now kernel should be able
> to verify signature of newly loaded kernel. 
> 
> This is an early RFC patchset. I have not done signature handling
> part yet. This is more of a minimal patch to show how new system
> call and functionality will look like. Right now it can only handle
> bzImage with 64bit entry point on x86_64. No EFI, no x86_32  or any
> other architecture. Rest of the things can be added slowly as need
> arises. In first iteration, I have tried to address most common use case
> for us.
> 
> Any feedback is welcome.
> 
> Vivek Goyal (6):
>   kexec: Export vmcoreinfo note size properly
>   kexec: Move segment verification code in a separate function
>   resource: Provide new functions to walk through resources
>   kexec: A new system call, kexec_file_load, for in kernel kexec
>   kexec-bzImage: Support for loading bzImage using 64bit entry
>   kexec: Support for Kexec on panic using new system call
> 
>  arch/x86/include/asm/crash.h         |    9 +
>  arch/x86/include/asm/kexec-bzimage.h |   12 +
>  arch/x86/include/asm/kexec.h         |   43 ++
>  arch/x86/kernel/Makefile             |    2 +
>  arch/x86/kernel/crash.c              |  585 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  arch/x86/kernel/kexec-bzimage.c      |  420 +++++++++++++++++++
>  arch/x86/kernel/machine_kexec_64.c   |   60 +++-
>  arch/x86/kernel/purgatory_entry_64.S |  119 ++++++
>  arch/x86/syscalls/syscall_64.tbl     |    1 +
>  include/linux/ioport.h               |    6 +
>  include/linux/kexec.h                |   57 +++
>  include/linux/syscalls.h             |    3 +
>  include/uapi/linux/kexec.h           |    4 +
>  kernel/kexec.c                       |  731 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>  kernel/ksysfs.c                      |    2 +-
>  kernel/resource.c                    |  108 +++++-
>  kernel/sys_ni.c                      |    1 +
>  17 files changed, 2074 insertions(+), 89 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 arch/x86/include/asm/crash.h
>  create mode 100644 arch/x86/include/asm/kexec-bzimage.h
>  create mode 100644 arch/x86/kernel/kexec-bzimage.c
>  create mode 100644 arch/x86/kernel/purgatory_entry_64.S
> 
> -- 
> 1.7.7.6
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> kexec mailing list
> kexec@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec

_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec

      parent reply	other threads:[~2013-12-02 13:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 90+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-11-20 17:50 [PATCH 0/6] kexec: A new system call to allow in kernel loading Vivek Goyal
2013-11-20 17:50 ` [PATCH 1/6] kexec: Export vmcoreinfo note size properly Vivek Goyal
2013-11-21 18:59   ` Greg KH
2013-11-21 19:08     ` Vivek Goyal
2013-11-20 17:50 ` [PATCH 2/6] kexec: Move segment verification code in a separate function Vivek Goyal
2013-11-20 17:50 ` [PATCH 3/6] resource: Provide new functions to walk through resources Vivek Goyal
2013-11-20 17:50 ` [PATCH 4/6] kexec: A new system call, kexec_file_load, for in kernel kexec Vivek Goyal
2013-11-21 19:03   ` Greg KH
2013-11-21 19:06     ` Matthew Garrett
2013-11-21 19:13       ` Vivek Goyal
2013-11-21 19:19         ` Matthew Garrett
2013-11-21 19:24           ` Vivek Goyal
2013-11-22 18:57           ` Vivek Goyal
2013-11-23  3:39             ` Eric W. Biederman
2013-11-25 16:39               ` Vivek Goyal
2013-11-26 12:23                 ` Eric W. Biederman
2013-11-26 14:27                   ` Vivek Goyal
2013-12-19 12:54                     ` Torsten Duwe
2013-12-20 14:19                       ` Vivek Goyal
2013-12-20 23:11                         ` Eric W. Biederman
2013-12-20 23:20                           ` Kees Cook
2013-12-21 11:38                             ` Torsten Duwe
2014-01-02 20:39                             ` Vivek Goyal
2014-01-02 20:56                               ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-01-06 21:33                                 ` Josh Boyer
2014-01-07  4:22                                   ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-12-20 23:20                           ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-12-21  1:32                             ` Eric W. Biederman
2013-12-21  3:32                               ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-12-21 12:15                                 ` Torsten Duwe
2013-11-21 19:16     ` Vivek Goyal
2013-11-22  1:03     ` Kees Cook
2013-11-22  2:13       ` Vivek Goyal
2013-11-22 20:42   ` Jiri Kosina
2014-01-17 19:17     ` Vivek Goyal
2013-11-29  3:10   ` Baoquan He
2013-12-02 15:27     ` WANG Chao
2013-12-02 15:44     ` Vivek Goyal
2013-12-04  1:35       ` Baoquan He
2013-12-04 17:19         ` Vivek Goyal
2013-12-04  1:56   ` Baoquan He
2013-12-04  8:19     ` Baoquan He
2013-12-04 17:32     ` Vivek Goyal
2013-11-20 17:50 ` [PATCH 5/6] kexec-bzImage: Support for loading bzImage using 64bit entry Vivek Goyal
2013-11-21 19:07   ` Greg KH
2013-11-21 19:21     ` Vivek Goyal
2013-11-22 15:24       ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-11-28 11:35   ` Baoquan He
2013-12-02 15:36     ` Vivek Goyal
2013-11-20 17:50 ` [PATCH 6/6] kexec: Support for Kexec on panic using new system call Vivek Goyal
2013-11-28 11:28   ` Baoquan He
2013-12-02 15:30     ` Vivek Goyal
2013-12-04  1:51       ` Baoquan He
2013-12-04 17:20         ` Vivek Goyal
2013-12-04  1:41   ` Baoquan He
2013-12-04 17:19     ` Vivek Goyal
2013-11-21 18:58 ` [PATCH 0/6] kexec: A new system call to allow in kernel loading Greg KH
2013-11-21 19:07   ` Vivek Goyal
2013-11-21 19:46     ` Vivek Goyal
2013-11-21 19:06 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2013-11-21 19:14   ` Vivek Goyal
2013-11-21 23:07 ` Eric W. Biederman
2013-11-22  1:28   ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-11-22  2:35     ` Vivek Goyal
2013-11-22  2:40       ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-11-22  1:55   ` Vivek Goyal
2013-11-22  9:09     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2013-11-22 13:30       ` Jiri Kosina
2013-11-22 13:46         ` Vivek Goyal
2013-11-22 13:50           ` Jiri Kosina
2013-11-22 15:33             ` Vivek Goyal
2013-11-22 17:45               ` Kees Cook
2013-11-22 13:43       ` Vivek Goyal
2013-11-22 15:25         ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2013-11-22 15:33           ` Jiri Kosina
2013-11-22 15:57             ` Eric Paris
2013-11-22 16:04               ` Jiri Kosina
2013-11-22 16:08                 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-11-22 13:34     ` Eric W. Biederman
2013-11-22 14:19       ` Vivek Goyal
2013-11-22 19:48         ` Greg KH
2013-11-23  3:23         ` Eric W. Biederman
2013-12-04 19:34           ` Vivek Goyal
2013-12-05  4:10             ` Eric W. Biederman
2013-11-25 10:04       ` Michael Holzheu
2013-11-25 15:36         ` Vivek Goyal
2013-11-25 16:15           ` Michael Holzheu
2013-11-22  0:55 ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-11-22  2:03   ` Vivek Goyal
2013-12-03 13:23 ` Baoquan He [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20131203132303.GA3826@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=bhe@redhat.com \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
    --cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).