From: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Cc: mjg59@srcf.ucam.org, greg@kroah.com, kexec@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ebiederm@xmission.com,
hpa@zytor.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] kexec: A new system call to allow in kernel loading
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2013 21:23:03 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131203132303.GA3826@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1384969851-7251-1-git-send-email-vgoyal@redhat.com>
Tested kdump and kexec using --use-kexec2-syscall on kenrel 3.13.0-rc2+,
they work very well.
On 11/20/13 at 12:50pm, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> Current proposed secureboot implementation disables kexec/kdump because
> it can allow unsigned kernel to run on a secureboot platform. Intial
> idea was to sign /sbin/kexec binary and let that binary do the kernel
> signature verification. I had posted RFC patches for this apparoach
> here.
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/9/10/560
>
> Later we had discussion at Plumbers and most of the people thought
> that signing and trusting /sbin/kexec is becoming complex. So a
> better idea might be let kernel do the signature verification of
> new kernel being loaded. This calls for implementing a new system call
> and moving lot of user space code in kernel.
>
> kexec_load() system call allows loading a kexec/kdump kernel and jump
> to that kernel at right time. Though a lot of processing is done in
> user space which prepares a list of segments/buffers to be loaded and
> kexec_load() works on that list of segments. It does not know what's
> contained in those segments.
>
> Now a new system call kexec_file_load() is implemented which takes
> kernel fd and initrd fd as parameters. Now kernel should be able
> to verify signature of newly loaded kernel.
>
> This is an early RFC patchset. I have not done signature handling
> part yet. This is more of a minimal patch to show how new system
> call and functionality will look like. Right now it can only handle
> bzImage with 64bit entry point on x86_64. No EFI, no x86_32 or any
> other architecture. Rest of the things can be added slowly as need
> arises. In first iteration, I have tried to address most common use case
> for us.
>
> Any feedback is welcome.
>
> Vivek Goyal (6):
> kexec: Export vmcoreinfo note size properly
> kexec: Move segment verification code in a separate function
> resource: Provide new functions to walk through resources
> kexec: A new system call, kexec_file_load, for in kernel kexec
> kexec-bzImage: Support for loading bzImage using 64bit entry
> kexec: Support for Kexec on panic using new system call
>
> arch/x86/include/asm/crash.h | 9 +
> arch/x86/include/asm/kexec-bzimage.h | 12 +
> arch/x86/include/asm/kexec.h | 43 ++
> arch/x86/kernel/Makefile | 2 +
> arch/x86/kernel/crash.c | 585 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/x86/kernel/kexec-bzimage.c | 420 +++++++++++++++++++
> arch/x86/kernel/machine_kexec_64.c | 60 +++-
> arch/x86/kernel/purgatory_entry_64.S | 119 ++++++
> arch/x86/syscalls/syscall_64.tbl | 1 +
> include/linux/ioport.h | 6 +
> include/linux/kexec.h | 57 +++
> include/linux/syscalls.h | 3 +
> include/uapi/linux/kexec.h | 4 +
> kernel/kexec.c | 731 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> kernel/ksysfs.c | 2 +-
> kernel/resource.c | 108 +++++-
> kernel/sys_ni.c | 1 +
> 17 files changed, 2074 insertions(+), 89 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 arch/x86/include/asm/crash.h
> create mode 100644 arch/x86/include/asm/kexec-bzimage.h
> create mode 100644 arch/x86/kernel/kexec-bzimage.c
> create mode 100644 arch/x86/kernel/purgatory_entry_64.S
>
> --
> 1.7.7.6
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> kexec mailing list
> kexec@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-02 13:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 90+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-20 17:50 [PATCH 0/6] kexec: A new system call to allow in kernel loading Vivek Goyal
2013-11-20 17:50 ` [PATCH 1/6] kexec: Export vmcoreinfo note size properly Vivek Goyal
2013-11-21 18:59 ` Greg KH
2013-11-21 19:08 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-11-20 17:50 ` [PATCH 2/6] kexec: Move segment verification code in a separate function Vivek Goyal
2013-11-20 17:50 ` [PATCH 3/6] resource: Provide new functions to walk through resources Vivek Goyal
2013-11-20 17:50 ` [PATCH 4/6] kexec: A new system call, kexec_file_load, for in kernel kexec Vivek Goyal
2013-11-21 19:03 ` Greg KH
2013-11-21 19:06 ` Matthew Garrett
2013-11-21 19:13 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-11-21 19:19 ` Matthew Garrett
2013-11-21 19:24 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-11-22 18:57 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-11-23 3:39 ` Eric W. Biederman
2013-11-25 16:39 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-11-26 12:23 ` Eric W. Biederman
2013-11-26 14:27 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-12-19 12:54 ` Torsten Duwe
2013-12-20 14:19 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-12-20 23:11 ` Eric W. Biederman
2013-12-20 23:20 ` Kees Cook
2013-12-21 11:38 ` Torsten Duwe
2014-01-02 20:39 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-01-02 20:56 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-01-06 21:33 ` Josh Boyer
2014-01-07 4:22 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-12-20 23:20 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-12-21 1:32 ` Eric W. Biederman
2013-12-21 3:32 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-12-21 12:15 ` Torsten Duwe
2013-11-21 19:16 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-11-22 1:03 ` Kees Cook
2013-11-22 2:13 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-11-22 20:42 ` Jiri Kosina
2014-01-17 19:17 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-11-29 3:10 ` Baoquan He
2013-12-02 15:27 ` WANG Chao
2013-12-02 15:44 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-12-04 1:35 ` Baoquan He
2013-12-04 17:19 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-12-04 1:56 ` Baoquan He
2013-12-04 8:19 ` Baoquan He
2013-12-04 17:32 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-11-20 17:50 ` [PATCH 5/6] kexec-bzImage: Support for loading bzImage using 64bit entry Vivek Goyal
2013-11-21 19:07 ` Greg KH
2013-11-21 19:21 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-11-22 15:24 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-11-28 11:35 ` Baoquan He
2013-12-02 15:36 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-11-20 17:50 ` [PATCH 6/6] kexec: Support for Kexec on panic using new system call Vivek Goyal
2013-11-28 11:28 ` Baoquan He
2013-12-02 15:30 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-12-04 1:51 ` Baoquan He
2013-12-04 17:20 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-12-04 1:41 ` Baoquan He
2013-12-04 17:19 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-11-21 18:58 ` [PATCH 0/6] kexec: A new system call to allow in kernel loading Greg KH
2013-11-21 19:07 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-11-21 19:46 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-11-21 19:06 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2013-11-21 19:14 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-11-21 23:07 ` Eric W. Biederman
2013-11-22 1:28 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-11-22 2:35 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-11-22 2:40 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-11-22 1:55 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-11-22 9:09 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2013-11-22 13:30 ` Jiri Kosina
2013-11-22 13:46 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-11-22 13:50 ` Jiri Kosina
2013-11-22 15:33 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-11-22 17:45 ` Kees Cook
2013-11-22 13:43 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-11-22 15:25 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2013-11-22 15:33 ` Jiri Kosina
2013-11-22 15:57 ` Eric Paris
2013-11-22 16:04 ` Jiri Kosina
2013-11-22 16:08 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-11-22 13:34 ` Eric W. Biederman
2013-11-22 14:19 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-11-22 19:48 ` Greg KH
2013-11-23 3:23 ` Eric W. Biederman
2013-12-04 19:34 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-12-05 4:10 ` Eric W. Biederman
2013-11-25 10:04 ` Michael Holzheu
2013-11-25 15:36 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-11-25 16:15 ` Michael Holzheu
2013-11-22 0:55 ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-11-22 2:03 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-12-03 13:23 ` Baoquan He [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131203132303.GA3826@localhost.localdomain \
--to=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).