From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1W9F7h-0001dS-Mt for kexec@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 31 Jan 2014 14:31:14 +0000 Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 09:30:47 -0500 From: Vivek Goyal Subject: Re: More frequent kexec-tools releases Message-ID: <20140131143047.GA10594@redhat.com> References: <20140128184042.GA7098@redhat.com> <52E85B26.2080203@cn.fujitsu.com> <20140129142311.GA15077@redhat.com> <20140131052304.GC25099@verge.net.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140131052304.GC25099@verge.net.au> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "kexec" Errors-To: kexec-bounces+dwmw2=twosheds.infradead.org@lists.infradead.org To: Simon Horman Cc: Kexec Mailing List , Dave Young , Zhang Yanfei , WANG Chao On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 02:23:04PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote: [..] > > Simon what do you think? A kexec-tools release every 4 months or every > > 6 months. Does it make sense to you? > > Perhaps we could aim for every second kernel release and see how that goes? Sounds Good. Kernel releases are roughly 3 months apart. So that would mean a kexec-tools release roughly around 6 months. This sounds like a good start. So 3.13 was release recently. And last kexec-tools release was in march 2013. May be it is a good idea to do one release now and then next one can be after release of kernel 3.15, 3.17 and so on. Thanks Vivek _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec