Kexec Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
To: WANG Chao <chaowang@redhat.com>
Cc: kexec@lists.infradead.org, horms@verge.net.au, linn@hp.com,
	hpa@zytor.com, dyoung@redhat.com, trenn@suse.de,
	ebiederm@xmission.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/4] x86: Pass memory range via E820 for kdump
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 09:53:13 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140328135313.GD2089@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140328045254.GB2944@dhcp-17-89.nay.redhat.com>

On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 12:52:54PM +0800, WANG Chao wrote:

[..]
> > > +static void add_setup_data(struct kexec_info *info,
> > > +			   struct x86_linux_param_header *real_mode,
> > > +			   struct setup_data *sd)
> > > +{
> > 
> > What is setup_data? A little comment above function will make it easy
> > to read. Is it that list of elements which contains extra memory map
> > entries?
> 
> Not exactly. All extra memory maps (for SETUP_E820_EXT type) are
> sealed into a single setup_data structure. Different types of setup_data
> are linked in a list.
> 
> setup_data can be used to pass extra data for boot, for example EFI
> data (SETUP_EFI), extended E820 map (SETUP_E820_EXT), SETUP_PCI and
> SETUP_DTB. These types are defined when defining struct setup_data.
> 
> It's offically documented in Documentation/x86/boot.txt.
> 
> Field name:	setup_data
> Type:		write (special)
> Offset/size:	0x250/8
> Protocol:	2.09+
> 
>   The 64-bit physical pointer to NULL terminated single linked list of
>   struct setup_data. This is used to define a more extensible boot
>   parameters passing mechanism. The definition of struct setup_data
>   is as follow:
> 
>   struct setup_data {
> 	  u64 next;
> 	  u32 type;
> 	  u32 len;
> 	  u8  data[0];
>   };
> 
>   Where, the next is a 64-bit physical pointer to the next node of
>   linked list, the next field of the last node is 0; the type is used
>   to identify the contents of data; the len is the length of data
>   field; the data holds the real payload.
> 
>   This list may be modified at a number of points during the bootup
>   process. Therefore, when modifying this list one should always make
>   sure to consider the case where the linked list already contains
>   entries.
> 
> I think I would comment add_setup_data as follows:
> 
> /*
>  * Added another instance to single linked list of struct setup_data.
>  * Please refer to kernel Documentation/x86/boot.txt for more details
>  * about setup_data structure.
>  */

Thanks for the explanation. Above comment will help the reader.

Thanks
Vivek

_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec

  reply	other threads:[~2014-03-28 13:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-03-19  8:03 [PATCH v4 0/4] kexec-tools, x86: E820 memmap pass for kdump WANG Chao
2014-03-19  8:03 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] cleanup: add dbgprint_mem_range function WANG Chao
2014-03-20  3:49   ` Simon Horman
2014-03-19  8:03 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] x86: Store memory ranges globally used for crash kernel to boot into WANG Chao
2014-03-27 22:32   ` Vivek Goyal
2014-03-28  5:23     ` WANG Chao
2014-03-28 14:01       ` Vivek Goyal
2014-03-28 15:44       ` Thomas Renninger
2014-03-28 16:05         ` Vivek Goyal
2014-03-28  2:19   ` Dave Young
2014-03-28  5:36     ` WANG Chao
2014-03-28  3:24   ` Dave Young
2014-03-28  6:13     ` WANG Chao
2014-03-28  6:43       ` Dave Young
2014-03-28  6:51         ` Dave Young
2014-03-28  7:12           ` Dave Young
2014-04-01  7:04         ` WANG Chao
2014-04-01  8:41           ` Dave Young
2014-04-01  8:54             ` WANG Chao
2014-04-01  9:36               ` Dave Young
2014-04-01  9:52                 ` WANG Chao
2014-03-19  8:04 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] x86: add --pass-memmap-cmdline option WANG Chao
2014-03-19  8:04 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] x86: Pass memory range via E820 for kdump WANG Chao
2014-03-27 22:50   ` Vivek Goyal
2014-03-28  4:52     ` WANG Chao
2014-03-28 13:53       ` Vivek Goyal [this message]
2014-03-28  3:28   ` Dave Young
2014-03-28  4:53     ` WANG Chao
2014-03-19 17:57 ` [PATCH v4 0/4] kexec-tools, x86: E820 memmap pass " Linn Crosetto
2014-03-20  3:50   ` Simon Horman
2014-03-20  5:00     ` WANG Chao
2014-03-20 15:42 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-03-27 10:31   ` WANG Chao
2014-03-27 22:23     ` Vivek Goyal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140328135313.GD2089@redhat.com \
    --to=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    --cc=chaowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=horms@verge.net.au \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linn@hp.com \
    --cc=trenn@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox