From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from kirsty.vergenet.net ([202.4.237.240]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1WY1au-0005W3-Ei for kexec@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 09 Apr 2014 23:07:49 +0000 Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 08:07:21 +0900 From: Simon Horman Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH] ppc64/purgatory: Disabling GCC's stack protection Message-ID: <20140409230721.GA2187@verge.net.au> References: <20140325095553.17118.47384.stgit@nimbus> <20140408144445.3929.88414.stgit@nimbus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140408144445.3929.88414.stgit@nimbus> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "kexec" Errors-To: kexec-bounces+dwmw2=twosheds.infradead.org@lists.infradead.org To: Laurent Dufour Cc: dvaleev@suse.com, kexec@lists.infradead.org On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 04:44:45PM +0200, Laurent Dufour wrote: > Some Linux distributions, like Suse, are turning on the GCC's stack > protection mechanism by default (-fstack-protector). When building the > purgatory with this option, this leads to link issues that are revealed at > runtime when the purgatory is loaded because symbols like __stack_chk_fail > are unresolved. > > This patch forces this stack protection mechanism to be turned off when > building the purgatory on ppc64 BE and LE. > > Signed-off-by: Laurent Dufour Thanks, applied. _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec