Kexec Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: WANG Chao <chaowang@redhat.com>
To: Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>
Cc: kexec@lists.infradead.org, horms@verge.net.au, linn@hp.com,
	hpa@zytor.com, trenn@suse.de, vgoyal@redhat.com,
	ebiederm@xmission.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/10] kexec-tools, x86: E820 memmap pass for kdump
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 10:14:47 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140411021447.GC2944@dhcp-17-89.nay.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140411020622.GC5493@dhcp-16-198.nay.redhat.com>

On 04/11/14 at 10:06am, Dave Young wrote:
> On 04/10/14 at 05:12pm, WANG Chao wrote:
> > Hi, all
> > 
> > (Sorry for this late update. I was occupied with something else)
> > 
> > This patchset enables passing memory map via E820 map on x86 platform instead
> > of memmap=exactmap. It's a better design and will solve the following problem
> > so far:
> > 
> > - kernel cmdline is limited resource and large machines tend to have many
> >   memory ranges that may excceed kernel cmdline limit size.
> > - kASLR doesn't work with memmap=exactmap, because kASLR happens early than
> >   user defined memmap=exactmap takes effect.
> > 
> > Unfortunately, saved_max_pfn still got its user out there (calgry pci, it looks
> > like the only one). So for backward compatibility, I'm introducing a new option
> > --pass-memmap-cmdline to force kexec-tools to pass memmap=exactmap, the old way.
> > 
> > This patchset contains massive updates from the previous one. I take some
> > suggestions from reviewers. I try to split the changes into smaller pieces and
> > keep the whole change as minimal as I can so it wouldn't be too harsh to review
> > the patch.
> > 
> > Any comment is appreciate!
> > 
> > v5->v4:
> > Dave:
> >  - separate add_setup_data() to another patch
> > Vivek:
> >  - adding comments for setup_data
> >  - store crash memory range info golobally in kexec_info
> > 
> > v3->v4:
> > Linn: check return value of malloc (use xmalloc).
> > me: fix dbgprintf_mem_range.
> > 
> > v2->v3:
> > Linn:
> >  - do not free sd (setup_data) buffer.
> >  - reuse code in setup_e820 and setup_e820_ext.
> > 
> > v1->v2:
> > Vivek:
> >  - Use function instead of macro for dbgprint_mem_range
> >  - Do not pass reserved memory range for kdump. It could addressed later
> >    separately.
> > 
> > WANG Chao (10):
> >   x86, cleanup: fix indent
> >   x86, cleanup: add extra arguments to add_memmap() and delete_memmap()
> >   x86, cleanup: add other types of memory range for 2nd kernel boot to
> >     memmap_p
> >   x86, cleanup: add_memmap() only do alignment check on RANGE_RAM
> >   x86, cleanup: use dbgprint_mem_range for memory range debugging
> >   x86, cleanup: increase CRASH_MAX_MEMMAP_NR up to
> >     CRASH_MAX_MEMORY_RANGES
> >   x86, cleanup: Store crash memory ranges kexec_info
> >   x86, cleanup: Add a funtion add_setup_data()
> >   x86: add --pass-memmap-cmdline option
> >   x86: Pass memory range via E820 for kdump
> > 
> >  kexec/arch/i386/crashdump-x86.c        |  79 +++++++--------
> >  kexec/arch/i386/crashdump-x86.h        |   2 +-
> >  kexec/arch/i386/include/arch/options.h |   2 +
> >  kexec/arch/i386/kexec-x86.c            |   4 +
> >  kexec/arch/i386/kexec-x86.h            |   1 +
> >  kexec/arch/i386/x86-linux-setup.c      | 175 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> >  kexec/arch/i386/x86-linux-setup.h      |   1 +
> >  kexec/arch/x86_64/kexec-x86_64.c       |   5 +
> >  kexec/kexec.h                          |   2 +
> >  9 files changed, 171 insertions(+), 100 deletions(-)
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Here is what I received, seems there's some duplicate patches?

Sorry, I rearranged some patches and forget to remove the old one.

I'll resend. Thanks for noticing me.

Thanks
WANG Chao

_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec

  reply	other threads:[~2014-04-11  2:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-04-10  9:12 [PATCH v5 00/10] kexec-tools, x86: E820 memmap pass for kdump WANG Chao
2014-04-10  9:12 ` [PATCH v5 01/10] x86, cleanup: fix indent WANG Chao
2014-04-10  9:12 ` [PATCH v5 02/10] x86, cleanup: add extra arguments to add_memmap() and delete_memmap() WANG Chao
2014-04-11  2:22   ` Dave Young
2014-04-11  4:47     ` WANG Chao
2014-04-10  9:12 ` [PATCH v5 03/10] x86, cleanup: add other types of memory range for 2nd kernel boot to memmap_p WANG Chao
2014-04-11  2:24   ` Dave Young
2014-04-11  3:02     ` WANG Chao
2014-04-10  9:12 ` [PATCH v5 04/10] x86, cleanup: add_memmap() only do alignment check on RANGE_RAM WANG Chao
2014-04-10  9:12 ` [PATCH v5 05/10] x86, cleanup: use dbgprint_mem_range for memory range debugging WANG Chao
2014-04-10 20:18   ` Linn Crosetto
2014-04-11  2:00     ` Dave Young
2014-04-11  2:11       ` WANG Chao
2014-04-10  9:12 ` [PATCH v5 06/10] x86, cleanup: increase CRASH_MAX_MEMMAP_NR up to CRASH_MAX_MEMORY_RANGES WANG Chao
2014-04-10  9:13 ` [PATCH v5 06/10] x86, cleanup: Store crash memory ranges kexec_info WANG Chao
2014-04-11  2:20   ` Dave Young
2014-04-11  3:17     ` WANG Chao
2014-04-11  6:10       ` Dave Young
2014-04-11  6:50         ` WANG Chao
2014-04-11  7:02           ` Dave Young
2014-04-10  9:13 ` [PATCH v5 07/10] x86, cleanup: Add a funtion add_setup_data() WANG Chao
2014-04-10  9:13 ` [PATCH v5 07/10] x86, cleanup: Store crash memory ranges kexec_info WANG Chao
2014-04-10  9:13 ` [PATCH v5 08/10] x86: add --pass-memmap-cmdline option WANG Chao
2014-04-10  9:13 ` [PATCH v5 08/10] x86, cleanup: Add a funtion add_setup_data() WANG Chao
2014-04-10  9:13 ` [PATCH v5 09/10] x86: add --pass-memmap-cmdline option WANG Chao
2014-04-10  9:13 ` [PATCH v5 09/10] x86: Pass memory range via E820 for kdump WANG Chao
2014-04-11  2:28   ` Dave Young
2014-04-11  2:36     ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-04-11  2:47       ` Dave Young
2014-04-11  2:55         ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-04-11  3:00         ` WANG Chao
2014-04-11  3:33           ` WANG Chao
2014-04-11  2:06 ` [PATCH v5 00/10] kexec-tools, x86: E820 memmap pass " Dave Young
2014-04-11  2:14   ` WANG Chao [this message]
2014-04-11  3:05 ` WANG Chao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140411021447.GC2944@dhcp-17-89.nay.redhat.com \
    --to=chaowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=horms@verge.net.au \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linn@hp.com \
    --cc=trenn@suse.de \
    --cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox