From: WANG Chao <chaowang@redhat.com>
To: Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>
Cc: kexec@lists.infradead.org, horms@verge.net.au, linn@hp.com,
hpa@zytor.com, trenn@suse.de, vgoyal@redhat.com,
ebiederm@xmission.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/10] kexec-tools, x86: E820 memmap pass for kdump
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 10:14:47 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140411021447.GC2944@dhcp-17-89.nay.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140411020622.GC5493@dhcp-16-198.nay.redhat.com>
On 04/11/14 at 10:06am, Dave Young wrote:
> On 04/10/14 at 05:12pm, WANG Chao wrote:
> > Hi, all
> >
> > (Sorry for this late update. I was occupied with something else)
> >
> > This patchset enables passing memory map via E820 map on x86 platform instead
> > of memmap=exactmap. It's a better design and will solve the following problem
> > so far:
> >
> > - kernel cmdline is limited resource and large machines tend to have many
> > memory ranges that may excceed kernel cmdline limit size.
> > - kASLR doesn't work with memmap=exactmap, because kASLR happens early than
> > user defined memmap=exactmap takes effect.
> >
> > Unfortunately, saved_max_pfn still got its user out there (calgry pci, it looks
> > like the only one). So for backward compatibility, I'm introducing a new option
> > --pass-memmap-cmdline to force kexec-tools to pass memmap=exactmap, the old way.
> >
> > This patchset contains massive updates from the previous one. I take some
> > suggestions from reviewers. I try to split the changes into smaller pieces and
> > keep the whole change as minimal as I can so it wouldn't be too harsh to review
> > the patch.
> >
> > Any comment is appreciate!
> >
> > v5->v4:
> > Dave:
> > - separate add_setup_data() to another patch
> > Vivek:
> > - adding comments for setup_data
> > - store crash memory range info golobally in kexec_info
> >
> > v3->v4:
> > Linn: check return value of malloc (use xmalloc).
> > me: fix dbgprintf_mem_range.
> >
> > v2->v3:
> > Linn:
> > - do not free sd (setup_data) buffer.
> > - reuse code in setup_e820 and setup_e820_ext.
> >
> > v1->v2:
> > Vivek:
> > - Use function instead of macro for dbgprint_mem_range
> > - Do not pass reserved memory range for kdump. It could addressed later
> > separately.
> >
> > WANG Chao (10):
> > x86, cleanup: fix indent
> > x86, cleanup: add extra arguments to add_memmap() and delete_memmap()
> > x86, cleanup: add other types of memory range for 2nd kernel boot to
> > memmap_p
> > x86, cleanup: add_memmap() only do alignment check on RANGE_RAM
> > x86, cleanup: use dbgprint_mem_range for memory range debugging
> > x86, cleanup: increase CRASH_MAX_MEMMAP_NR up to
> > CRASH_MAX_MEMORY_RANGES
> > x86, cleanup: Store crash memory ranges kexec_info
> > x86, cleanup: Add a funtion add_setup_data()
> > x86: add --pass-memmap-cmdline option
> > x86: Pass memory range via E820 for kdump
> >
> > kexec/arch/i386/crashdump-x86.c | 79 +++++++--------
> > kexec/arch/i386/crashdump-x86.h | 2 +-
> > kexec/arch/i386/include/arch/options.h | 2 +
> > kexec/arch/i386/kexec-x86.c | 4 +
> > kexec/arch/i386/kexec-x86.h | 1 +
> > kexec/arch/i386/x86-linux-setup.c | 175 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> > kexec/arch/i386/x86-linux-setup.h | 1 +
> > kexec/arch/x86_64/kexec-x86_64.c | 5 +
> > kexec/kexec.h | 2 +
> > 9 files changed, 171 insertions(+), 100 deletions(-)
>
> Hi,
>
> Here is what I received, seems there's some duplicate patches?
Sorry, I rearranged some patches and forget to remove the old one.
I'll resend. Thanks for noticing me.
Thanks
WANG Chao
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-11 2:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-10 9:12 [PATCH v5 00/10] kexec-tools, x86: E820 memmap pass for kdump WANG Chao
2014-04-10 9:12 ` [PATCH v5 01/10] x86, cleanup: fix indent WANG Chao
2014-04-10 9:12 ` [PATCH v5 02/10] x86, cleanup: add extra arguments to add_memmap() and delete_memmap() WANG Chao
2014-04-11 2:22 ` Dave Young
2014-04-11 4:47 ` WANG Chao
2014-04-10 9:12 ` [PATCH v5 03/10] x86, cleanup: add other types of memory range for 2nd kernel boot to memmap_p WANG Chao
2014-04-11 2:24 ` Dave Young
2014-04-11 3:02 ` WANG Chao
2014-04-10 9:12 ` [PATCH v5 04/10] x86, cleanup: add_memmap() only do alignment check on RANGE_RAM WANG Chao
2014-04-10 9:12 ` [PATCH v5 05/10] x86, cleanup: use dbgprint_mem_range for memory range debugging WANG Chao
2014-04-10 20:18 ` Linn Crosetto
2014-04-11 2:00 ` Dave Young
2014-04-11 2:11 ` WANG Chao
2014-04-10 9:12 ` [PATCH v5 06/10] x86, cleanup: increase CRASH_MAX_MEMMAP_NR up to CRASH_MAX_MEMORY_RANGES WANG Chao
2014-04-10 9:13 ` [PATCH v5 06/10] x86, cleanup: Store crash memory ranges kexec_info WANG Chao
2014-04-11 2:20 ` Dave Young
2014-04-11 3:17 ` WANG Chao
2014-04-11 6:10 ` Dave Young
2014-04-11 6:50 ` WANG Chao
2014-04-11 7:02 ` Dave Young
2014-04-10 9:13 ` [PATCH v5 07/10] x86, cleanup: Add a funtion add_setup_data() WANG Chao
2014-04-10 9:13 ` [PATCH v5 07/10] x86, cleanup: Store crash memory ranges kexec_info WANG Chao
2014-04-10 9:13 ` [PATCH v5 08/10] x86: add --pass-memmap-cmdline option WANG Chao
2014-04-10 9:13 ` [PATCH v5 08/10] x86, cleanup: Add a funtion add_setup_data() WANG Chao
2014-04-10 9:13 ` [PATCH v5 09/10] x86: add --pass-memmap-cmdline option WANG Chao
2014-04-10 9:13 ` [PATCH v5 09/10] x86: Pass memory range via E820 for kdump WANG Chao
2014-04-11 2:28 ` Dave Young
2014-04-11 2:36 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-04-11 2:47 ` Dave Young
2014-04-11 2:55 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-04-11 3:00 ` WANG Chao
2014-04-11 3:33 ` WANG Chao
2014-04-11 2:06 ` [PATCH v5 00/10] kexec-tools, x86: E820 memmap pass " Dave Young
2014-04-11 2:14 ` WANG Chao [this message]
2014-04-11 3:05 ` WANG Chao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140411021447.GC2944@dhcp-17-89.nay.redhat.com \
--to=chaowang@redhat.com \
--cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=horms@verge.net.au \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linn@hp.com \
--cc=trenn@suse.de \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox