From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
To: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com, ananth@in.ibm.com, matt@ozlabs.org,
kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
suzuki@in.ibm.com, ebiederm@xmission.com,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
paulus@samba.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc, kexec: Fix "Processor X is stuck" issue during kexec from ST mode
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2014 09:46:49 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140604134649.GB27557@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1401833365.3247.36.camel@pasglop>
On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 08:09:25AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-06-04 at 01:58 +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
> > Yep, that makes sense. But unfortunately I don't have enough insight into
> > why exactly powerpc has to online the CPUs before doing a kexec. I just
> > know from the commit log and the comment mentioned above (and from my own
> > experiments) that the CPUs will get stuck if they were offline. Perhaps
> > somebody more knowledgeable can explain this in detail and suggest a proper
> > long-term solution.
> >
> > Matt, Ben, any thoughts on this?
>
> The problem is with our "soft offline" which we do on some platforms. When we
> offline we don't actually send the CPUs back to firmware or anything like that.
>
> We put them into a very low low power loop inside Linux.
>
> The new kernel has no way to extract them from that loop. So we must re-"online"
> them before we kexec so they can be passed to the new kernel normally (or returned
> to firmware like we do on powernv).
Srivatsa,
Looks like your patch has been merged.
I don't like the following change in arch independent code.
/*
* migrate_to_reboot_cpu() disables CPU hotplug assuming that
* no further code needs to use CPU hotplug (which is true in
* the reboot case). However, the kexec path depends on using
* CPU hotplug again; so re-enable it here.
*/
cpu_hotplug_enable();
As it is very powerpc specific requirement, can you enable hotplug in powerpc
arch dependent code as a short term solution.
Ideally one needs to fix the requirement of online all cpus in powerpc
as a long term solution and then get rid of hotplug enable call.
Thanks
Vivek
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-04 13:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-27 10:55 [PATCH] powerpc, kexec: Fix "Processor X is stuck" issue during kexec from ST mode Srivatsa S. Bhat
2014-05-28 13:31 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-06-03 20:28 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2014-06-03 22:09 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2014-06-04 13:46 ` Vivek Goyal [this message]
2014-06-06 12:30 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2014-06-06 18:27 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-06-06 19:00 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2014-06-06 12:29 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2014-06-06 12:37 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2014-06-06 21:16 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2014-06-12 6:39 ` Joel Stanley
2014-06-12 8:17 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2014-06-04 13:41 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-06-06 12:31 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140604134649.GB27557@redhat.com \
--to=vgoyal@redhat.com \
--cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=matt@ozlabs.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=suzuki@in.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).