From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-path: <kexec-bounces+dwmw2=infradead.org@lists.infradead.org>
Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([2a01:4f8:120:8448::d00d])
 by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux))
 id 1WvMse-0006wK-Ae
 for kexec@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 13 Jun 2014 08:30:37 +0000
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2014 10:30:12 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/13] kexec: Implementation of new syscall kexec_file_load
Message-ID: <20140613083012.GC4751@pd.tnic>
References: <1401800822-27425-8-git-send-email-vgoyal@redhat.com>
 <20140606065605.GE2785@dhcp-17-89.nay.redhat.com>
 <20140606181859.GK1526@redhat.com>
 <20140609021122.GB1924@darkstar.nay.redhat.com>
 <20140609053538.GA2874@dhcp-17-89.nay.redhat.com>
 <20140609154137.GD22049@redhat.com> <20140613075011.GA4751@pd.tnic>
 <20140613080028.GK15034@dhcp-17-89.nay.redhat.com>
 <20140613081050.GB4751@pd.tnic>
 <20140613082459.GL15034@dhcp-17-89.nay.redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20140613082459.GL15034@dhcp-17-89.nay.redhat.com>
List-Id: <kexec.lists.infradead.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/options/kexec>,
 <mailto:kexec-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/kexec/>
List-Post: <mailto:kexec@lists.infradead.org>
List-Help: <mailto:kexec-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec>,
 <mailto:kexec-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: "kexec" <kexec-bounces@lists.infradead.org>
Errors-To: kexec-bounces+dwmw2=infradead.org@lists.infradead.org
To: WANG Chao <chaowang@redhat.com>
Cc: mjg59@srcf.ucam.org, bhe@redhat.com, greg@kroah.com, hpa@zytor.com, kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ebiederm@xmission.com, jkosina@suse.cz, akpm@linux-foundation.org, Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>

On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 04:24:59PM +0800, WANG Chao wrote:
> Emm.. I'm not sure, but I think there might be a chance that
> COMMAND_LINE_SIZE extend in the future. In general 8K is safe to use,
> because the current greatest one is 4K.

Sure, but kexec cannot load a kernel of different arch, can it?
Which means, we're safe using the arch-specific definition of
COMMAND_LINE_SIZE.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--

_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec