From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1XMRKk-0007N1-Q8 for kexec@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 00:43:31 +0000 Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 20:42:41 -0400 From: Vivek Goyal Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] kexec: minor fixups and enhancements Message-ID: <20140827004241.GA25728@redhat.com> References: <20140825165916.GC14379@redhat.com> <1409099608.21254.16.camel@smoke> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1409099608.21254.16.camel@smoke> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "kexec" Errors-To: kexec-bounces+dwmw2=infradead.org@lists.infradead.org To: Geoff Levand Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt , kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Eric Biederman , Andrew Morton , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 05:33:28PM -0700, Geoff Levand wrote: > Hi Vivek, > > On Mon, 2014-08-25 at 12:59 -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote: > > Does arm64 has secureboot? If yes, then it might make sense to > > enable the new syscall kexec_file_load() on arm64 instead of trying > > to make old syscall work first. > > Yes, arm64 should support secureboot, but I have not looked into it. > > When do you expect syscall kexec_file_load to get merged? I won't wait > until then to push my current kexec work. It got merged in 3.17-rc1 Thanks Vivek _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec