From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from kirsty.vergenet.net ([202.4.237.240]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1XMY9A-0007AY-4Z for kexec@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 08:00:00 +0000 Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 16:59:37 +0900 From: Simon Horman Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] kexec: Provide an option to use new kexec system call Message-ID: <20140827075936.GA5936@verge.net.au> References: <20140818152232.GA7525@redhat.com> <20140826143034.GD9081@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140826143034.GD9081@redhat.com> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "kexec" Errors-To: kexec-bounces+dwmw2=infradead.org@lists.infradead.org To: Vivek Goyal Cc: Kexec Mailing List , Dave Young , Baoquan He , WANG Chao On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 10:30:34AM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote: > On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 11:22:32AM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote: > > Hi, > > > > This is v2 of the patch. Since v1, I moved syscall implemented check littler > > earlier in the function as per the feedback. > > > > Now a new kexec syscall (kexec_file_load()) has been merged in upstream > > kernel. This system call takes file descriptors of kernel and initramfs > > as input (as opposed to list of segments to be loaded). This new system > > call allows for signature verification of the kernel being loaded. > > > > One use of signature verification of kernel is secureboot systems where > > we want to allow kexec into a kernel only if it is validly signed by > > a key system trusts. > > > > This patch provides and option --kexec-file-syscall (-s), to force use of > > new system call for kexec. Default is to continue to use old syscall. > > > > Currently only bzImage64 on x86_64 can be loaded using this system call. > > As kernel adds support for more arches and for more image types, kexec-tools > > can be modified accordingly. > > > > Hi Simon, > > Do you have any concerns with this patch? If not, can you please consider > it for merge. Thanks, applied. _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec