From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1XUyKF-0007kf-Hl for kexec@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 19 Sep 2014 13:34:16 +0000 Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 09:33:53 -0400 From: Vivek Goyal Subject: Re: [RFC] autokdump - automated kdump testsuite Message-ID: <20140919133353.GD2190@redhat.com> References: <145412866.25258463.1411119061796.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> <293476264.25264480.1411120345360.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> <20140919132236.GB2190@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140919132236.GB2190@redhat.com> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "kexec" Errors-To: kexec-bounces+dwmw2=infradead.org@lists.infradead.org To: CAI Qian Cc: ltp-list , crash-utility , kexec , linux-kernel , kexec kdump redhat mailing list On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 09:22:36AM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote: > On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 05:52:25AM -0400, CAI Qian wrote: > > I plan to release an automated kdump testsuite that will be > > So will this be a standalone test suit? Can it be merged with > something already existing say, LTP. Also how about calling it just kdumptest. autokdump feels more like as if there have been improvements to kdump mechanism and there is improved method named "autokdump". kdumptest is more intuitive and it being "auto" is more or less implied. Thanks Vivek _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec