From: Michael Holzheu <holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Atsushi Kumagai <kumagai-atsushi@mxc.nes.nec.co.jp>
Cc: "kexec@lists.infradead.org" <kexec@lists.infradead.org>,
"bhe@redhat.com" <bhe@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] makedumpfile: Enable --mem-usage for s390x
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 14:23:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141010142310.4c488f6a@holzheu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0910DD04CBD6DE4193FCF86B9C00BE9701D4D5E4@BPXM01GP.gisp.nec.co.jp>
On Thu, 9 Oct 2014 06:41:10 +0000
Atsushi Kumagai <kumagai-atsushi@mxc.nes.nec.co.jp> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> >On Tue, 30 Sep 2014 17:02:01 +0800
> >Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On 09/29/14 at 03:14pm, Michael Holzheu wrote:
> >> > Implement is_vmalloc_addr() using /proc/iommem parsing to enable the new
> >> > makedumpfile option "--mem-usage".
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Michael Holzheu <holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> >>
> >>
> >> Hi Michael,
> >>
> >> This idea looks good to me. One question, should it be put in
> >> arch/s390.c since this is only for s390? Then iomem_for_each_line() need
> >> be declared in makedumpfile.h .
> >>
> >> If later it's needed by other arch, can be taken out to makedumpfile.c,
> >> that should be better. Surely this is only my personal concern, if
> >> Atsushi like to accept it, I am fine too.
> >
> >Hello Atsushi,
> >
> >What is your preference regarding this question?
> >
> >Michael
>
> In the first place, this is_vmalloc_addr() for s390 isn't a good
> implementation because it works only on 1st kernel due to the
> dependence on /proc/iomem. is_vmalloc_addr_XXX() are general functions,
> they can be called from any path besides --mem-usage.
>
> I think the Michael's first idea below is better since it implements
> is_real_addr() only for --mem-usage as a common function for all
> architectures, it's explicit design.
>
> >@@ -854,7 +854,7 @@ int get_kcore_dump_loads(void)
> >
> > for (i = 0; i < num_pt_loads; ++i) {
> > struct pt_load_segment *p = &pt_loads[i];
> >- if (is_vmalloc_addr(p->virt_start))
> >+ if (!is_real_addr(p->virt_start))
> > continue;
> > loads++;
> > }
>
> However, this code will not work since the argument of is_real_addr()
> must be physical address. Even unluckily, /proc/kcore's PT_LOAD looks
> useless for VtoP converting because PhysAddr is always 0:
>
> Program Headers:
> Type Offset VirtAddr PhysAddr
> FileSiz MemSiz Flags Align
> NOTE 0x00000000000002a8 0x0000000000000000 0x0000000000000000
> 0x0000000000000a84 0x0000000000000000 0
> LOAD 0x00007fffff601000 0xffffffffff600000 0x0000000000000000
> 0x0000000000001000 0x0000000000001000 RWE 1000
> LOAD 0x00007fff81001000 0xffffffff81000000 0x0000000000000000
> 0x0000000000a1b000 0x0000000000a1b000 RWE 1000
> LOAD 0x0000490000001000 0xffffc90000000000 0x0000000000000000
> 0x00001fffffffffff 0x00001fffffffffff RWE 1000
> LOAD 0x00007fffa0001000 0xffffffffa0000000 0x0000000000000000
> 0x000000005f000000 0x000000005f000000 RWE 1000
> ...
>
>
> So the way using /proc/iomem seems inappropriate, we have to consider other
> approaches (but I still don't have any good ideas...)
Hello Atsushi,
Hmmm ok, sure. For x86 using /proc/iomem does not work because there is no 1:1
mapping for the kernel address space. The kernel/real memory is mapped somewhere
at the end, right?
For s390 we have a 1:1 mapping for the kernel physical memory that starts with
zero. Therefore IMHO we could use /proc/iomem. For example, on my s390x system
with 1GB memory and 256MB crashkernel:
$ cat /proc/iomem
00000000-2fffffff : System RAM
00000000-007ddd4b : Kernel code
007ddd4c-00bfcc5f : Kernel data
00e18000-01c28b1f : Kernel bss
30000000-3fffffff : Crash kernel
$ objdump -h /proc/kcore
...
Type Offset VirtAddr PhysAddr
FileSiz MemSiz Flags Align
NOTE 0x0000000000000158 0x0000000000000000 0x0000000000000000
0x00000000000027fc 0x0000000000000000 0
LOAD 0x000003e080003000 0x000003e080000000 0x0000000000000000
0x0000001f00000000 0x0000001f00000000 RWE 1000
LOAD 0x000003ff80003000 0x000003ff80000000 0x0000000000000000
0x0000000080000000 0x0000000080000000 RWE 1000
LOAD 0x0000000000003000 0x0000000000000000 0x0000000000000000
0x0000000030000000 0x0000000030000000 RWE 1000
LOAD 0x000003d100003000 0x000003d100000000 0x0000000000000000
0x0000000000c00000 0x0000000000c00000 RWE 1000
So in that case every /proc/kcore load that is below 0x30000000 must
be real memory.
Michael
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-10 12:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-01 3:15 [PATCH v6 0/8] add a new interface to show the memory usage of 1st kernel Baoquan He
2014-09-01 3:15 ` [PATCH v6 1/8] initialize pfn_memhole in get_num_dumpable_cyclic Baoquan He
2014-09-01 3:15 ` [PATCH v6 2/8] functions to get crashkernel memory range Baoquan He
2014-09-01 3:15 ` [PATCH v6 3/8] preparation functions for parsing vmcoreinfo Baoquan He
2014-09-01 3:15 ` [PATCH v6 4/8] set vmcoreinfo for kcore Baoquan He
2014-09-01 3:15 ` [PATCH v6 5/8] prepare the dump loads for kcore analysis Baoquan He
2014-09-01 3:15 ` [PATCH v6 6/8] introduce a function exclude_zero_pages_cyclic() Baoquan He
2014-09-01 3:15 ` [PATCH v6 7/8] implement a function to print the memory usage Baoquan He
2014-09-01 3:15 ` [PATCH v6 8/8] add a new interface to show the memory usage of 1st kernel Baoquan He
2014-09-02 11:52 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-09-02 13:15 ` Baoquan He
2014-09-02 13:24 ` Baoquan He
2014-09-03 8:18 ` Atsushi Kumagai
2014-09-03 8:21 ` bhe
2014-09-02 6:20 ` [PATCH v6 0/8] " Atsushi Kumagai
2014-09-02 6:38 ` bhe
2014-09-22 15:02 ` Add "--mem-usage" support for s390x Michael Holzheu
2014-09-23 2:40 ` Baoquan He
2014-09-23 2:48 ` Baoquan He
2014-09-23 2:58 ` Baoquan He
2014-09-24 15:19 ` Michael Holzheu
2014-09-25 9:44 ` Baoquan He
2014-09-26 8:10 ` Michael Holzheu
2014-09-26 8:55 ` Baoquan He
2014-09-26 9:14 ` Baoquan He
2014-09-26 11:34 ` Michael Holzheu
2014-09-29 9:04 ` Baoquan He
2014-09-29 13:12 ` Michael Holzheu
2014-09-29 13:14 ` [PATCH] makedumpfile: Enable --mem-usage " Michael Holzheu
2014-09-30 9:02 ` Baoquan He
2014-10-01 16:59 ` Michael Holzheu
2014-10-09 6:41 ` Atsushi Kumagai
2014-10-10 12:23 ` Michael Holzheu [this message]
2014-10-14 7:19 ` Atsushi Kumagai
2014-10-14 7:28 ` bhe
2014-10-14 7:42 ` bhe
2014-10-16 12:37 ` Michael Holzheu
2014-10-23 6:56 ` Atsushi Kumagai
2014-10-23 10:30 ` Michael Holzheu
2014-10-30 1:29 ` Atsushi Kumagai
2014-10-30 9:14 ` Michael Holzheu
2014-10-31 5:25 ` Atsushi Kumagai
2014-10-27 7:57 ` bhe
2014-10-27 9:04 ` bhe
2014-10-28 4:34 ` Atsushi Kumagai
2014-10-28 4:34 ` Atsushi Kumagai
2014-10-28 4:46 ` bhe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141010142310.4c488f6a@holzheu \
--to=holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=kumagai-atsushi@mxc.nes.nec.co.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox