From: Petr Tesarik <ptesarik@suse.cz>
To: kexec@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFD] efi assisted kdump
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2015 17:03:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150124170344.3b06a23e@hananiah.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150124132637.GB2139@darkstar.redhat.com>
On Sat, 24 Jan 2015 21:26:37 +0800
Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Kdump has several limitations currently such as kdump kernel reboot will bypass
> device shutdown path so device drivers should reset during initialization.
>
>[...]
>
> ppc64 has a feature "firmware assisted kdump", see below documentation:
> Documentation/powerpc/firmware-assisted-dump.txt
Hi Dave,
while I'm no expert on either UEFI or IBM POWER, I'd like to warn you
that fadump (firmware-assisted dump) on PPC is not quite optimal in its
current form. One of the things that have always irritated me are
excessive RAM requirements.
The problem is that there is only one reboot in fadump - after saving
the dump, the secondary kernel discards the saved area and continues
booting as usual. However, many kernel structuers must be already
allocated at that point, e.g. the memmap array(s), but they are sized
by the total RAM, not the limited amount available to the 2nd kernel.
This issue is not so bad on a typical IBM POWER system, because these
machines tend to be partitioned into many small LPARs, where each has
relatively little RAM. But on a machine with 6TB RAM, you'll have to
reserve approx. 84G merely for the memmap array on the secondary
kernel's boot, which looks just a bit wasteful...
Maybe the two approaches can be combined somehow, so that the
kdump system uses kexec() to transition into the production system, but
that only works if a normal kexec does not have any of the issues
you're trying to address.
Just my two cents,
Petr Tesarik
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-24 16:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-24 13:26 [RFD] efi assisted kdump Dave Young
2015-01-24 16:03 ` Petr Tesarik [this message]
2015-01-27 6:21 ` Dave Young
2015-01-27 9:14 ` Petr Tesarik
2015-01-26 14:08 ` Vivek Goyal
2015-01-27 6:24 ` Dave Young
2015-01-26 16:39 ` Matt Fleming
2015-01-27 6:37 ` Dave Young
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150124170344.3b06a23e@hananiah.suse.cz \
--to=ptesarik@suse.cz \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox