From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from e06smtp12.uk.ibm.com ([195.75.94.108]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1YToIG-0005ao-Fu for kexec@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 06 Mar 2015 09:11:41 +0000 Received: from /spool/local by e06smtp12.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Fri, 6 Mar 2015 09:11:16 -0000 Received: from b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay10.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.195]) by d06dlp01.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B15517D8068 for ; Fri, 6 Mar 2015 09:11:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av07.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av07.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.37.248]) by b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id t269BEaU8388958 for ; Fri, 6 Mar 2015 09:11:14 GMT Received: from d06av07.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by d06av07.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id t269BEgC005361 for ; Fri, 6 Mar 2015 04:11:14 -0500 Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 10:11:12 +0100 From: Michael Holzheu Subject: Re: [PATCH] makedumpfile: Use file offset in initialize_mmap() Message-ID: <20150306101112.34756de7@holzheu> In-Reply-To: <20150305223005.07c552d8@hananiah.suse.cz> References: <20150227131409.33dd14a4@hananiah.suse.cz> <20150303101543.416b5cb4@holzheu> <20150303110750.3feed6ec@hananiah.suse.cz> <20150304134418.4d1f0cbf@holzheu> <20150305223005.07c552d8@hananiah.suse.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "kexec" Errors-To: kexec-bounces+dwmw2=infradead.org@lists.infradead.org To: Petr Tesarik Cc: Atsushi Kumagai , kexec mailing list , Jan Willeke On Thu, 5 Mar 2015 22:30:05 +0100 Petr Tesarik wrote: > On Wed, 4 Mar 2015 13:44:18 +0100 > Michael Holzheu wrote: > [snip] > > What do you think? > > I'm not sure. Clearly, we should get rid of the temporary buffer. OTOH > this slow-down should be observed on all architectures, not just s390. > > Now, mmap should have been implemented in the cache code, not above it. > Since I wrote the cache, this task is probably up to me. Sounds good, thanks! Michael _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec