Kexec Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>, kexec@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] kexec: remove ordering constraints from -x (--no-ifdown) and -y (--no-sync)
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 09:29:44 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150414002944.GB10790@verge.net.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150413170156.GH2596@htj.duckdns.org>

On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 01:01:56PM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 03:16:44PM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > From 81b5889b49f0f2448c3e9543c5c936d52348910c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
> > Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 15:11:09 -0400
> > 
> > Currently, the two options must be the last ones to be honored;
> > otherwise, they can get silently ignored and both the manpage and help
> > text point it out.  This is error-prone and trivial to fix.  There
> > isn't much point in pointing something out in documentation when the
> > peculiarity can be removed with four lines of extra code.
> > 
> > Update option handling so that the two arguments are honored
> > regardless of their positions.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
> 
> Ping?

Hi Tejun,

For some reason I don't seem to have this patch in my inbox.
Could you repost it?

_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec

  reply	other threads:[~2015-04-14  0:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-26 19:16 [PATCH 1/2] kexec: implement -y (--no-sync) option Tejun Heo
2015-03-26 19:16 ` [PATCH 2/2] kexec: remove ordering constraints from -x (--no-ifdown) and -y (--no-sync) Tejun Heo
2015-04-13 17:01   ` Tejun Heo
2015-04-14  0:29     ` Simon Horman [this message]
2015-04-14 12:15       ` [PATCH REPOST 1/2] kexec: implement -y (--no-sync) option Tejun Heo
2015-04-14 12:16         ` [PATCH REPOST 2/2] kexec: remove ordering constraints from -x (--no-ifdown) and -y (--no-sync) Tejun Heo
2015-04-15  1:09         ` [PATCH REPOST 1/2] kexec: implement -y (--no-sync) option Simon Horman
2015-04-15  2:42           ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150414002944.GB10790@verge.net.au \
    --to=horms@verge.net.au \
    --cc=clm@fb.com \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox