From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from kirsty.vergenet.net ([202.4.237.240]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1Yl6nh-00055f-Mw for kexec@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 02:23:38 +0000 Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 11:23:07 +0900 From: Simon Horman Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/6] purgatory: Fix memcmp for src address increment Message-ID: <20150423022307.GA23384@verge.net.au> References: <6ac5de6bcd76b7a0790c3a403fa0c629c4a4eff8.1429201849.git.panand@redhat.com> <1429289744.5479.6.camel@infradead.org> <20150420002527.GA17827@verge.net.au> <553783C2.3080207@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <553783C2.3080207@redhat.com> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "kexec" Errors-To: kexec-bounces+dwmw2=infradead.org@lists.infradead.org To: Pratyush Anand Cc: Geoff Levand , kexec@lists.infradead.org On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 04:49:30PM +0530, Pratyush Anand wrote: > > > On Monday 20 April 2015 05:55 AM, Simon Horman wrote: > >On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 09:55:44AM -0700, Geoff Levand wrote: > >>On Thu, 2015-04-16 at 22:17 +0530, Pratyush Anand wrote: > >>>src addresses are not being incremented, so only first byte is compared > >>>instead of first len bytes. > >> > >>So I guess this means we never really had proper error > >>checking in purgatory... Better merge this one. > >> > >>Acked-by: Geoff Levand > > > >Hi Pratyush, > > > >If you'd like me to take this plase repost it with Geoff's Ack > >and without "RFC". > > > > It is already now in Geoff's tree so may be I do not resend it. I'm a little unsure of the nature of Geoff's tree. But if anything is ready to be merged into my tree in preparation for the next official release then I'm all ears. _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec