Kexec Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: HATAYAMA Daisuke <d.hatayama@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, ebiederm@xmission.com,
	vgoyal@redhat.com, mingo@kernel.org
Cc: masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com, hidehiro.kawai.ez@hitachi.com,
	kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	bhe@redhat.com
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/2] kernel/panic: call the 2nd crash_kexec() only if crash_kexec_post_notifiers is enabled
Date: Fri, 15 May 2015 20:01:44 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150515110143.8431.38836.stgit@localhost6.localdomain6> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150515105953.8431.65220.stgit@localhost6.localdomain6>

For compatibility with the behaviour before the commit
f06e5153f4ae2e2f3b0300f0e260e40cb7fefd45, the 2nd crash_kexec() should
be called only if crash_kexec_post_notifiers is enabled.

Note that crash_kexec() returns immediately if kdump crash kernel is
not loaded, so in this case, this patch makes no functionality change,
but the point is to make it explicit, from the caller panic() side,
that the 2nd crash_kexec() does nothing.

Signed-off-by: HATAYAMA Daisuke <d.hatayama@jp.fujitsu.com>
Suggested-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/panic.c |    3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/panic.c b/kernel/panic.c
index 8136ad7..774614f 100644
--- a/kernel/panic.c
+++ b/kernel/panic.c
@@ -142,7 +142,8 @@ void panic(const char *fmt, ...)
 	 * Note: since some panic_notifiers can make crashed kernel
 	 * more unstable, it can increase risks of the kdump failure too.
 	 */
-	crash_kexec(NULL);
+	if (crash_kexec_post_notifiers)
+		crash_kexec(NULL);
 
 	bust_spinlocks(0);
 


_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec

  reply	other threads:[~2015-05-15 11:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-15 11:01 [PATCH v3 0/2] kernel/panic/kexec: fix "crash_kexec_post_notifiers" option issue in oops path HATAYAMA Daisuke
2015-05-15 11:01 ` HATAYAMA Daisuke [this message]
2015-05-15 11:01 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] " HATAYAMA Daisuke

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150515110143.8431.38836.stgit@localhost6.localdomain6 \
    --to=d.hatayama@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bhe@redhat.com \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=hidehiro.kawai.ez@hitachi.com \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox