From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2015 01:08:45 +0200 From: Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [V3 PATCH 3/4] kexec: Fix race between panic() and crash_kexec() called directly Message-ID: <20150820230845.GF3161@worktop.event.rightround.com> References: <20150806054543.25766.29590.stgit@softrs> <20150806054543.25766.5914.stgit@softrs> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150806054543.25766.5914.stgit@softrs> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "kexec" Errors-To: kexec-bounces+dwmw2=infradead.org@lists.infradead.org To: Hidehiro Kawai Cc: x86@kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Michal Hocko , Thomas Gleixner , "Eric W. Biederman" , "H. Peter Anvin" , Masami Hiramatsu , Andrew Morton , Ingo Molnar , Vivek Goyal On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 02:45:43PM +0900, Hidehiro Kawai wrote: > void crash_kexec(struct pt_regs *regs) > { > + int old_cpu, this_cpu; > + > + /* > + * `old_cpu == -1' means we are the first comer and crash_kexec() > + * was called without entering panic(). > + * `old_cpu == this_cpu' means crash_kexec() was called from panic(). > + */ > + this_cpu = raw_smp_processor_id(); > + old_cpu = atomic_cmpxchg(&panic_cpu, -1, this_cpu); > + if (old_cpu != -1 && old_cpu != this_cpu) > + return; This allows recursive calling of crash_kexec(), the Changelog did not mention that. Is this really required? > + > /* Take the kexec_mutex here to prevent sys_kexec_load > * running on one cpu from replacing the crash kernel > * we are using after a panic on a different cpu. _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec