From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from kirsty.vergenet.net ([202.4.237.240]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ZWxhu-0004s9-Ov for kexec@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 02 Sep 2015 02:23:27 +0000 Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2015 11:22:41 +0900 From: Simon Horman Subject: Re: [PATCH] Drop release date from kexec-tools version output Message-ID: <20150902022241.GH12080@verge.net.au> References: <20150902012412.GA8022@dhcp-128-42.nay.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150902012412.GA8022@dhcp-128-42.nay.redhat.com> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "kexec" Errors-To: kexec-bounces+dwmw2=infradead.org@lists.infradead.org To: Dave Young Cc: kexec@lists.infradead.org On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 09:24:12AM +0800, Dave Young wrote: > kexec --version reports like below: > kexec-tools 2.0.7 released 05 February 2015 > > The date string is generated when one run bootstrap script, thus > it is more like a build date instead of release date. > Even for distribution like Fedora it will make more sense if it can > report something like "kexec-tools 2.0.7-1 released 05 February 2015" > > In case building from git tree, the date cause more confusion. > So let's remove it from version string unless there is better idea > to resolve the issue. > > Signed-off-by: Dave Young Thanks, applied. _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec