From: Michael Holzheu <holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
Cc: stefan.roscher@de.ibm.com, kexec@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] kexec: use mmap instead of read for slurp_file()
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2015 10:48:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150902104839.17674456@holzheu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150902010721.GE30886@verge.net.au>
On Wed, 2 Sep 2015 10:07:21 +0900
Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au> wrote:
[snip]
> > The slurp_fd() function allocates memory and uses the read() system call.
> > This results in double memory consumption for image and initrd:
> >
> > 1) Memory allocated in user space by the kexec tool
> > 2) Memory allocated in kernel by the kexec() system call
> >
> > Therefore use mmap() for non-character devices to reduce the memory
> > consumption of the kexec tool.
>
> I'm not opposed to this change but I also don't see a strong motivation for
> it. I would imagine that the memory saving is not that large. And that the
> memory consumption disappears when the presumably short-lived kexec process
> exits.
Correct it will disappear.
The reason for the the patch is that we have the following scanario:
1) Boot a 4 GB Linux system
2) Read kernel and 1,5 GB ramdisk from external source into local tmpfs (ram)
3) kexec the kernel and ramdisk
So without the mmap patch for the kexec runtime we need:
1,5 GB (tmpfs) + 1,5 GB (kexec malloc) + 1,5 GB (kernel memory) = 4,5 GB
If we use mmap we only need 3 GB memory.
Regards,
Michael
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-02 9:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-18 16:17 [RFC PATCH] kexec: use mmap instead of read for slurp_file() Michael Holzheu
2015-08-28 14:26 ` PING: " Michael Holzheu
2015-09-02 1:07 ` Simon Horman
2015-09-02 8:48 ` Michael Holzheu [this message]
2015-09-04 9:45 ` Simon Horman
2015-09-04 12:11 ` [PATCH] " Michael Holzheu
2015-09-07 6:44 ` Simon Horman
2015-10-15 0:05 ` Geoff Levand
2015-10-15 12:31 ` Michael Holzheu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150902104839.17674456@holzheu \
--to=holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=horms@verge.net.au \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=stefan.roscher@de.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox