From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from kirsty.vergenet.net ([202.4.237.240]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1Zmu7M-0000cK-AY for kexec@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 01:47:36 +0000 Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 10:47:06 +0900 From: Simon Horman Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] ppc64: Fix warnings Message-ID: <20151016014706.GE20667@verge.net.au> References: <1444172150-29493-1-git-send-email-scottwood@freescale.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1444172150-29493-1-git-send-email-scottwood@freescale.com> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "kexec" Errors-To: kexec-bounces+dwmw2=infradead.org@lists.infradead.org To: Scott Wood Cc: kexec@lists.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Michael Ellerman On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 05:55:48PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote: > Produce a warning-free build on ppc64 (at least, when built as 64-bit > userspace -- if a 64-bit binary for ppc64 is a requirement, why is -m64 > set only on purgatory?). Mostly unused (or write-only) variable > warnings, but also one nasty one where reserve() was used without a > prototype, causing long long arguments to be passed as int. > > Signed-off-by: Scott Wood Thanks, applied. I would have slightly preferred one-patch per problem. _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec