From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1a5p6s-0002Tt-0B for kexec@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 07 Dec 2015 06:17:18 +0000 Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2015 11:46:53 +0530 From: Pratyush Anand Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] arm64: Fix KVBASE Message-ID: <20151207061653.GC16406@dhcppc13.redhat.com> References: <3c83adde922e0ce26bafd8b189242b73fadbe40e.1449332470.git.panand@redhat.com> <56631206.9040500@codeaurora.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <56631206.9040500@codeaurora.org> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "kexec" Errors-To: kexec-bounces+dwmw2=infradead.org@lists.infradead.org To: Timur Tabi Cc: ats-kumagai@wm.jp.nec.com, asamson@codeaurora.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org, rruigrok@codeaurora.org, sgoel@codeaurora.org, dyoung@redhat.com Hi Timur, Thanks for your review. On 05/12/2015:10:34:14 AM, Timur Tabi wrote: > Pratyush Anand wrote: > >+ & (0xffffffffffffffffUL << (VA_BITS - 1)); > > Shouldn't this be ULL instead of just UL? I think on 64 bit platform, unsigned long is always 64 bit (with gcc). More over, info->page_offset is unsigned long. So, I think using UL would be in sync, no? ~Pratyush _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec