From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from pandora.armlinux.org.uk ([2001:4d48:ad52:3201:214:fdff:fe10:1be6]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.85_2 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1bNyp0-0001gX-DT for kexec@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 15 Jul 2016 08:50:11 +0000 Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2016 09:49:25 +0100 From: Russell King - ARM Linux Subject: Re: [RFC 0/3] extend kexec_file_load system call Message-ID: <20160715084925.GD1041@n2100.armlinux.org.uk> References: <20160712014201.11456-1-takahiro.akashi@linaro.org> <5352106.oQ0Ff9gWJA@wuerfel> <20160713094127.GC14522@leverpostej> <7352796.seiSnHrYPy@wuerfel> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7352796.seiSnHrYPy@wuerfel> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "kexec" Errors-To: kexec-bounces+dwmw2=infradead.org@lists.infradead.org To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Mark Rutland , bhe@redhat.com, Dave Young , kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, AKASHI Takahiro , "Eric W. Biederman" , bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Vivek Goyal , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 03:13:42PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Wednesday, July 13, 2016 10:41:28 AM CEST Mark Rutland wrote: > > The big question is whether this is a realistic case on a secure boot > > system. > > What does x86 do here? I assume changes to the command line are also > limited. They aren't. You can specify /anything/ even with a fully-signed kernel and initrd, which was one of the things I pointed out in my previous set of responses. -- RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up according to speedtest.net. _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec