From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-path: <kexec-bounces+dwmw2=infradead.org@lists.infradead.org>
Received: from smtp2.provo.novell.com ([137.65.250.81])
 by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.85_2 #1 (Red Hat Linux))
 id 1bNy1L-00008u-5v
 for kexec@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 15 Jul 2016 07:58:52 +0000
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2016 09:58:22 +0200
From: Petr Tesarik <ptesarik@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kexec: Add option to fallback to old kexec syscall when
 kexec file based syscall failed
Message-ID: <20160715095822.5caaaa16@hananiah.suse.cz>
In-Reply-To: <20160714235722.GA27155@linux-rxt1.site>
References: <1468485911-21427-1-git-send-email-jlee@suse.com>
 <20160714145328.GD6789@redhat.com>
 <20160714235722.GA27155@linux-rxt1.site>
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <kexec.lists.infradead.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/options/kexec>,
 <mailto:kexec-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/kexec/>
List-Post: <mailto:kexec@lists.infradead.org>
List-Help: <mailto:kexec-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec>,
 <mailto:kexec-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: "kexec" <kexec-bounces@lists.infradead.org>
Errors-To: kexec-bounces+dwmw2=infradead.org@lists.infradead.org
To: joeyli <jlee@suse.com>
Cc: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>, "Lee, Chun-Yi" <joeyli.kernel@gmail.com>, kexec@lists.infradead.org, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>

On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 07:57:22 +0800
joeyli <jlee@suse.com> wrote:

> Hi Vivek
> 
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 10:53:28AM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 04:45:11PM +0800, Lee, Chun-Yi wrote:
> > > This patch adds a new "--fallback-kexec" option to give a chance to
> > > fallback to old kexec syscall when file based kexec syscall operation
> > > failed.
> > 
> > I think caller should switch to using different interface if need be. But
> > I don't see much point in providing an option for this in kexec-tools.
> > 
> > Vivek
> >
> 
> OK~ Understood!
> 
> Thanks for Baoquan's and your opinion for this patch.

Is there some sort of diagnostics, so a calling script can determine
whether kexec failed, because there's no suppor for kexec_file_load(2)
or for a different reason? 

Thanks,
Petr T

_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec