From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
To: Petr Tesarik <ptesarik@suse.com>
Cc: joeyli <jlee@suse.com>, "Lee, Chun-Yi" <joeyli.kernel@gmail.com>,
kexec@lists.infradead.org, Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kexec: Add option to fallback to old kexec syscall when kexec file based syscall failed
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2016 08:51:14 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160715125114.GA23514@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160715095822.5caaaa16@hananiah.suse.cz>
On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 09:58:22AM +0200, Petr Tesarik wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 07:57:22 +0800
> joeyli <jlee@suse.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Vivek
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 10:53:28AM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 04:45:11PM +0800, Lee, Chun-Yi wrote:
> > > > This patch adds a new "--fallback-kexec" option to give a chance to
> > > > fallback to old kexec syscall when file based kexec syscall operation
> > > > failed.
> > >
> > > I think caller should switch to using different interface if need be. But
> > > I don't see much point in providing an option for this in kexec-tools.
> > >
> > > Vivek
> > >
> >
> > OK~ Understood!
> >
> > Thanks for Baoquan's and your opinion for this patch.
>
> Is there some sort of diagnostics, so a calling script can determine
> whether kexec failed, because there's no suppor for kexec_file_load(2)
> or for a different reason?
Will we not get -ENOSYS if kexec_file_load() is not implemented?
Vivek
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-15 12:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-14 8:45 [PATCH] kexec: Add option to fallback to old kexec syscall when kexec file based syscall failed Lee, Chun-Yi
2016-07-14 9:51 ` Baoquan He
2016-07-14 10:02 ` Baoquan He
2016-07-14 10:35 ` joeyli
2016-07-14 14:12 ` Baoquan He
2016-07-14 14:53 ` Vivek Goyal
2016-07-14 23:57 ` joeyli
2016-07-15 7:58 ` Petr Tesarik
2016-07-15 10:28 ` joeyli
2016-07-15 11:20 ` Petr Tesarik
2016-07-15 12:51 ` Vivek Goyal [this message]
2016-07-15 14:42 ` Petr Tesarik
2016-07-15 15:13 ` Vivek Goyal
2016-07-15 15:26 ` Petr Tesarik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160715125114.GA23514@redhat.com \
--to=vgoyal@redhat.com \
--cc=horms@verge.net.au \
--cc=jlee@suse.com \
--cc=joeyli.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=ptesarik@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox