From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from tex.lwn.net ([70.33.254.29] helo=vena.lwn.net) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.85_2 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1bd03d-0007iM-R4 for kexec@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 19:11:22 +0000 Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 13:10:56 -0600 From: Jonathan Corbet Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 1/2] Documentation: kdump: remind user of nr_cpus Message-ID: <20160825131056.58bb1379@lwn.net> In-Reply-To: <20160824050645.GA8279@x1.redhat.com> References: <1471489907-27737-1-git-send-email-zhouwj-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> <1471489907-27737-2-git-send-email-zhouwj-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> <20160818111854.362bb972@lwn.net> <57B653D1.8060106@cn.fujitsu.com> <20160819095740.1cccc073@lwn.net> <57BA51E0.1070902@cn.fujitsu.com> <20160824050645.GA8279@x1.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "kexec" Errors-To: kexec-bounces+dwmw2=infradead.org@lists.infradead.org To: Baoquan He Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, xlpang@redhat.com, "Zhou, =?UTF-8?B?V2Vuamlhbi/lkajmlofliZE=?=" , kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, joe@perches.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, dyoung@redhat.com, vgoyal@redhat.com On Wed, 24 Aug 2016 13:06:45 +0800 Baoquan He wrote: > Hi Jon, do you think change as below is OK to you? So nr_cpus is the maximum value, and maxcpus is the current number. Figures. No wonder the documentation is confusing... Anyway, this is much more along the lines of what I was hoping for, yes; I'll go ahead and apply it. Many thanks for humoring me on this! jon _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec