From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from kirsty.vergenet.net ([202.4.237.240]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.85_2 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1bsLHA-0007rs-RH for kexec@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 07 Oct 2016 02:52:45 +0000 Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2016 11:52:21 +0900 From: Simon Horman Subject: Re: Patch merging process ? Message-ID: <20161007025221.GE13721@verge.net.au> References: <20161006050443.GA17064@x1> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20161006050443.GA17064@x1> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "kexec" Errors-To: kexec-bounces+dwmw2=infradead.org@lists.infradead.org To: Baoquan He Cc: Sylvain Munaut , kexec@lists.infradead.org On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 01:04:43PM +0800, Baoquan He wrote: > On 10/05/16 at 04:06pm, Sylvain Munaut wrote: > > Hi, > > > > > > I sent a series of 3 patch on the mailing list back in August : > > > > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/kexec/2016-August/017037.html > > > > They were pretty simple, but I didn't get any feedback (positive or > > negative) and I haven't seen them merged either ... > > > > Is there something more expected of me to get these upstream ? > > You can repost. Usually maintainer may be very busy on other issues, you > can ping them one or two weeks later if no feedback. I apologise that I have been unusually busy over the past months and I seem to have missed the patches you mention. Please re-post any patches for kexec-tools and I will look over them. _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec