From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 12:01:11 +0000 From: Will Deacon Subject: Re: [PATCH v29 4/9] arm64: kdump: implement machine_crash_shutdown() Message-ID: <20170112120111.GE1771@arm.com> References: <20161228043347.27358-1-takahiro.akashi@linaro.org> <20161228043605.27470-3-takahiro.akashi@linaro.org> <20170110113248.GC21598@arm.com> <20170111063626.GE20972@linaro.org> <20170111105405.GF12388@arm.com> <20170112042143.GF20972@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170112042143.GF20972@linaro.org> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "kexec" Errors-To: kexec-bounces+dwmw2=infradead.org@lists.infradead.org To: AKASHI Takahiro , catalin.marinas@arm.com, james.morse@arm.com, geoff@infradead.org, bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com, dyoung@redhat.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 01:21:44PM +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote: > On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 10:54:05AM +0000, Will Deacon wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 03:36:28PM +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 11:32:48AM +0000, Will Deacon wrote: > > > > On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 01:36:01PM +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote: > > > > > @@ -22,6 +25,7 @@ > > > > > extern const unsigned char arm64_relocate_new_kernel[]; > > > > > extern const unsigned long arm64_relocate_new_kernel_size; > > > > > > > > > > +static bool in_crash_kexec; > > > > > > > > Do you actually need this bool? Why not call kexec_crash_loaded() instead? > > > > > > The two have different meanings: > > > "in_crash_kexec" indicates that kdump is taking place, while > > > kexec_crash_loaded() tells us only whether crash dump kernel has been > > > loaded or not. > > > > > > It is crucial to distinguish them especially for machine_kexec() > > > which can be called on normal kexec even if kdump has been set up. > > > > Ah, I see. So how about just doing: > > > > if (kimage == kexec_crash_image) > > > > in machine_kexec? > > Yeah, it should work. > Do you want to merge the following hunk, > or expect that I will re-send the whole patch series > (with other changes if any)? Thanks, I'll fold it in and shout if I run into any problems. My plan is to queue this for 4.11. Will _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec