From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from kirsty.vergenet.net ([202.4.237.240]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.87 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1crIxi-0007fD-6Q for kexec@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 24 Mar 2017 06:44:40 +0000 Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2017 07:44:12 +0100 From: Simon Horman Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Support large number of memory ranges Message-ID: <20170324064412.GF1319@verge.net.au> References: <1490267819-13606-1-git-send-email-xlpang@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "kexec" Errors-To: kexec-bounces+dwmw2=infradead.org@lists.infradead.org To: "Ramsay, Frank" Cc: "kexec@lists.infradead.org" , Dave Young , Xunlei Pang On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 01:27:08PM +0000, Ramsay, Frank wrote: > ________________________________________ > From: Xunlei Pang > Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2017 7:16:59 AM > To: kexec@lists.infradead.org > Cc: Dave Young; Xunlei Pang; Ramsay, Frank > Subject: [PATCH] x86: Support large number of memory ranges > > We got a problem on one SGI 64TB machine, the current kexec-tools > failed to work due to the insufficient ranges(MAX_MEMORY_RANGES) > allowed which is defined as 1024(less than the ranges on the machine). > The kcore header is insufficient due to the same reason as well. > > To solve this, this patch simply doubles "MAX_MEMORY_RANGES" and > "KCORE_ELF_HEADERS_SIZE". > > Cc: Frank Ramsay > Signed-off-by: Xunlei Pang > > acking I tested this > Tested-by: Frank Ramsay Thanks, applied. _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec