From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from kirsty.vergenet.net ([202.4.237.240]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.87 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1d3KW7-00027V-DG for kexec@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 26 Apr 2017 10:49:53 +0000 Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2017 12:49:24 +0200 From: Simon Horman Subject: Re: [PATCH] memmap: Parse "Reserved" together with "reserved" Message-ID: <20170426104924.GA23556@verge.net.au> References: <20170426005526.27313-1-yinghai@kernel.org> <20170426062247.fbl62xrkrm7tvnga@gmail.com> <20170426072846.GA7344@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com> <20170426073148.GA7367@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170426073148.GA7367@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "kexec" Errors-To: kexec-bounces+dwmw2=infradead.org@lists.infradead.org To: Dave Young Cc: kexec@lists.infradead.org, Yinghai Lu , Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 03:31:48PM +0800, Dave Young wrote: > On 04/26/17 at 03:28pm, Dave Young wrote: > > On 04/26/17 at 08:22am, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > > > * Yinghai Lu wrote: > > > > > > > For x86 with recent kernel after > > > > commit 640e1b38b0 ("x86/boot/e820: Basic cleanup of e820.c") > > > > change "reserved" to "Reserved" in /sys firmware memmap and /proc/iomem. > > > > > > > > So here, we add handling for that too. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu > > > > > > > > --- > > > > kexec/arch/i386/crashdump-x86.c | 2 ++ > > > > kexec/arch/ia64/kexec-ia64.c | 2 ++ > > > > kexec/arch/mips/kexec-mips.c | 2 ++ > > > > kexec/firmware_memmap.c | 2 ++ > > > > 4 files changed, 8 insertions(+) > > > > > > I'd rather fix the bug I introduced and undo the reserved->Reserved string change > > > > This patch parses both 'reserved' and 'Reserved' it should be fine, but > > reverting the change in kernel sounds better.. > > Hmm, after press sending I noticed old kexec-tools with new kernel, it > is still a problem, so we'd better to revert the kernel changes. FWIW, if the kernel change hasn't hit a release then reverting (the reserved->Reserved portion of) it would be my preference. > > > in e820.c: I didn't realize that it's exposed in sysfs and had quasi-ABI > > > consequences for kexec. > > > > > > Agreed? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Ingo > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > kexec mailing list > > > kexec@lists.infradead.org > > > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec > > > > Thanks > > Dave > _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec