From: Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Cc: sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
rostedt@goodmis.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] print kdump kernel loaded status in stack dump
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2018 09:57:21 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180118015721.GC1812@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180117134217.6gjr5ep3g2ns2v3w@pathway.suse.cz>
On 01/17/18 at 02:42pm, Petr Mladek wrote:
> On Wed 2018-01-17 20:32:44, Dave Young wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Thanks for your comments.
> > On 01/17/18 at 09:57am, Petr Mladek wrote:
> > > On Wed 2018-01-17 12:50:57, Dave Young wrote:
> > > > It is useful to print kdump kernel loaded status in dump_stack()
> > > > especially when panic happens so that we can differenciate
> > > > kdump kernel early hang and a normal panic in a bug report.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > kernel/printk/printk.c | 3 +++
> > > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> > > >
> > > > --- linux-x86.orig/kernel/printk/printk.c
> > > > +++ linux-x86/kernel/printk/printk.c
> > > > @@ -48,6 +48,7 @@
> > > > #include <linux/sched/clock.h>
> > > > #include <linux/sched/debug.h>
> > > > #include <linux/sched/task_stack.h>
> > > > +#include <linux/kexec.h>
> > > >
> > > > #include <linux/uaccess.h>
> > > > #include <asm/sections.h>
> > > > @@ -3127,6 +3128,8 @@ void dump_stack_print_info(const char *l
> > > > if (dump_stack_arch_desc_str[0] != '\0')
> > > > printk("%sHardware name: %s\n",
> > > > log_lvl, dump_stack_arch_desc_str);
> > > > + if (kexec_crash_loaded())
> > > > + printk("%skdump kernel loaded\n", log_lvl);
> > >
> > > IMHO, it would be better to do it like for the workqueues.
> > > I mean to call printk_kexec_info(log_lv1, current) here
> > > that would be impletemented in kexec sources.
> > > Then it could be maintained by kexec people.
> > >
> > > Anyway, I wonder if the info about kexec_crash_loaded() is
> > > enough. I am not much familiar with kexec. AFAIK,
> > > the image might be loaded long time before it
> > > is acutally used.
> >
> > kexec_crash_loaded is enough, we only care if kdump kernel being
> > loaded or not, nothing else, no matter how long it has been loaded.
> > In Fedora/RHEL a kdump service takes care of loading the kernel but
> > it runs after networking is ready. If people want to save
> > the vmcore to nfs/ssh then we need detect network and build the
> > initramfs. In the nfs/ssh case if some networking code panicked it
> > is possible that kdump service has not started, but sometimes bug
> > can not be easily reproduced thus nobody can know if kdump is active
> > or not.
>
> I see.
>
> > Since kexec_crash_loaded() is already in kexec souce code, and it
> > is the only thing need to know, do you think it is really necessary
> > to add a printk_kexec_info()? I can do it if you strongly suggest
> > to do so.
>
> No, the original approach is fine if it is really that simple ;-)
>
> > >
> > > Finally, the style of the other lines is:
> > >
> > > Name: details
> > >
> > > I would suggest to print something like:
> > >
> > > Kexec: details
> > >
> > > , where the details might be whether the image is loaded,
> > > whether the loaded kernel is being executed, and
> > > other kexec-related flags.
> >
> > Will do, it can be something like:
> > Kexec: kdump kernel loaded
>
> Looks good to me. With this message, I could give this
> patch even
>
> Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
>
> I could update the string when pushing into printk.git.
> I am just going to wait a bit for more feedback if any.
Cool, thank you!
>
> Best Regards,
> Petr
Thanks
Dave
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-18 1:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-17 4:50 [PATCH] print kdump kernel loaded status in stack dump Dave Young
2018-01-17 8:57 ` Petr Mladek
2018-01-17 12:32 ` Dave Young
2018-01-17 13:42 ` Petr Mladek
2018-01-17 15:48 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-01-18 1:57 ` Dave Young [this message]
2018-01-18 18:02 ` Andi Kleen
2018-01-18 18:57 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-01-19 4:47 ` Dave Young
2018-01-19 13:06 ` Petr Tesarik
2018-01-26 7:37 ` Dave Young
2018-01-26 12:17 ` Petr Mladek
2018-01-27 3:57 ` Dave Young
2018-01-19 5:45 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-01-19 8:16 ` Dave Young
2018-01-19 8:28 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-01-19 8:42 ` Dave Young
2018-01-19 9:46 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-01-19 8:32 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-01-19 16:16 ` Andi Kleen
2018-01-19 16:51 ` Petr Tesarik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180118015721.GC1812@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com \
--to=dyoung@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox