From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5] helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.89 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1eqGm3-0002ek-7T for kexec@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 26 Feb 2018 11:16:55 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098414.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w1QBDlFk117373 for ; Mon, 26 Feb 2018 06:16:36 -0500 Received: from e06smtp14.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp14.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.110]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2gch3y89nc-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 26 Feb 2018 06:16:35 -0500 Received: from localhost by e06smtp14.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Mon, 26 Feb 2018 11:16:34 -0000 Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2018 12:16:28 +0100 From: Philipp Rudo Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/17] Add kexec_file_load support to s390 In-Reply-To: <20180226012100.GA6019@linaro.org> References: <20180212100754.55121-1-prudo@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20180214073543.GA12328@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com> <20180214105449.1325bfbe@ThinkPad> <20180223083405.GA29498@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com> <20180223110143.1747fb3f@ThinkPad> <20180224015956.GA11191@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com> <20180226012100.GA6019@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20180226121628.5e832adf@ThinkPad> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "kexec" Errors-To: kexec-bounces+dwmw2=infradead.org@lists.infradead.org To: AKASHI Takahiro Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Heiko Carstens , x86@kernel.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Martin Schwidefsky , Eric Biederman , Michael Ellerman , Thiago Jung Bauermann , Andrew Morton , Dave Young , Vivek Goyal Hi Dave Hi AKASHI On Mon, 26 Feb 2018 10:21:02 +0900 AKASHI Takahiro wrote: > > > > Arch code need arch maintainer to review, maybe either of you can send > > the common part first before the arch code, eg. AKASHI can split the common > > cleanup patches and post them as a separate series, after these prep > > series are reviewed then other patches can be refreshed based on it. > > > > Seems in AKASHI's series, only patch 2, 3 ,4 ,5 is needed if split out > > as a common change series. > > Yeah, all of those are touching kernel/kexec_file.c and in turn > they can conflict if being applied with 390 patches, but none of changes > that I made on kexec_file.c are overlapped with Phillips', I suppose > that merging these two patch sets is rather straightforward. > > @Phillips: I hope that your patch#14 and #17 be aligned with my patch#3 > as it is factoring out arch_kexec_{image_probe, image_load, verify_sig}() > and arch_kimage_file_post_load_cleanup(). Splitting the common code patches from the series is totally fine with me. On Friday I managed to get my code working with AKASHI's patches. After setting ARCH_HAS_PURGATORY and cleaning up the kexec_* functions it worked basically out of the box. However there is one problem with older compilers on s390. Please see my comment on patch #3 for details. Thanks Philipp _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec