From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-pg0-x241.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c05::241]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.89 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1erERK-0004Qg-5e for kexec@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 01 Mar 2018 02:59:28 +0000 Received: by mail-pg0-x241.google.com with SMTP id l131so1772230pga.2 for ; Wed, 28 Feb 2018 18:59:15 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2018 11:59:22 +0900 From: AKASHI Takahiro Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 02/13] kexec_file: make an use of purgatory optional Message-ID: <20180301025921.GL6019@linaro.org> References: <20180222111732.23051-1-takahiro.akashi@linaro.org> <20180222111732.23051-3-takahiro.akashi@linaro.org> <20180223084934.GB4433@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com> <20180226102418.GD6019@linaro.org> <20180228123359.GB2228@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180228123359.GB2228@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "kexec" Errors-To: kexec-bounces+dwmw2=infradead.org@lists.infradead.org To: Dave Young Cc: herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, bhe@redhat.com, ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, julien.thierry@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org, dhowells@redhat.com, arnd@arndb.de, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au, bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, davem@davemloft.net, vgoyal@redhat.com On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 08:33:59PM +0800, Dave Young wrote: > On 02/26/18 at 07:24pm, AKASHI Takahiro wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 04:49:34PM +0800, Dave Young wrote: > > > Hi AKASHI, > > > > > > On 02/22/18 at 08:17pm, AKASHI Takahiro wrote: > > > > On arm64, no trampline code between old kernel and new kernel will be > > > > required in kexec_file implementation. This patch introduces a new > > > > configuration, ARCH_HAS_KEXEC_PURGATORY, and allows related code to be > > > > compiled in only if necessary. > > > > > > Here also need the explanation about why no purgatory is needed, it would be > > > required for kexec if no strong reason. > > > > OK, I will add the reason: > > On arm64, crash dump kernel's usable memory is protected by > > *unmapping* it from kernel virtual space unlike other architectures > > where the region is just made read-only. > > So our key developers think that it is highly unlikely that the region > > is accidentally corrupted and this rationalizes that digest check code > > be also dropped from purgatory. > > This greatly simplifies our purgatory without any need for a bit ugly > > relocation stuff, i.e. arch_kexec_apply_relocations_add(). > > > > Please see: > > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2017-December/545428.html > > to find out how simple our purgatory was. All that it does is > > to shuffle arguments and jump into a new kernel. > > > > Without this patch, we would have to have purgatory with a space for > > a hash value (purgatory_sha256_digest) which is never checked against. > > > > Do you think it makes sense? > > Hmm, it looks reasonable, I remember there could be some performance > issue for a purgatory because of cache disabled for arm64. I do not > object this. Yeah, Pratyush(redhat) had expressed his concerns on slow boot-up of the 2nd kernel which is due to hash value calculation. -Takahiro AKASHI > > [snip] > > Thanks > Dave _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec