From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mx3-rdu2.redhat.com ([66.187.233.73] helo=mx1.redhat.com) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1fSa5G-0006vg-1X for kexec@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 12 Jun 2018 03:35:04 +0000 Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2018 11:34:43 +0800 From: Baoquan He Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/4] resource: Move reparent_resources() to kernel/resource.c and make it public Message-ID: <20180612033443.GB1820@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> References: <20180612032831.29747-1-bhe@redhat.com> <20180612032831.29747-2-bhe@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180612032831.29747-2-bhe@redhat.com> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "kexec" Errors-To: kexec-bounces+dwmw2=infradead.org@lists.infradead.org To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, dan.j.williams@intel.com, nicolas.pitre@linaro.org, josh@joshtriplett.org, fengguang.wu@intel.com, bp@suse.de Cc: brijesh.singh@amd.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, airlied@linux.ie, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, richard.weiyang@gmail.com, keith.busch@intel.com, jcmvbkbc@gmail.com, Paul Mackerras , baiyaowei@cmss.chinamobile.com, kys@microsoft.com, frowand.list@gmail.com, lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, sthemmin@microsoft.com, linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, Michael Ellerman , patrik.r.jakobsson@gmail.com, linux-input@vger.kernel.org, gustavo@padovan.org, dyoung@redhat.com, vgoyal@redhat.com, thomas.lendacky@amd.com, haiyangz@microsoft.com, maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com, jglisse@redhat.com, seanpaul@chromium.org, bhelgaas@google.com, tglx@linutronix.de, yinghai@kernel.org, jonathan.derrick@intel.com, chris@zankel.net, monstr@monstr.eu, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com, kexec@lists.infradead.org, Benjamin Herrenschmidt , ebiederm@xmission.com, devel@linuxdriverproject.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, davem@davemloft.net On 06/12/18 at 11:28am, Baoquan He wrote: > reparent_resources() is duplicated in arch/microblaze/pci/pci-common.c > and arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c, so move it to kernel/resource.c > so that it's shared. Later its code also need be updated using list_head > to replace singly linked list. > > Signed-off-by: Baoquan He > Cc: Michal Simek > Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt > Cc: Paul Mackerras > Cc: Michael Ellerman > --- > v4->v5: > Fix several code bugs reported by test robot on ARCH powerpc and > microblaze. Oops, I mistakenly added the patch change log of the current patch 0002 here. This patch is a newly added one. > > v3->v4: > Fix several bugs test robot reported. And change patch log. > > v2->v3: > Rename resource functions first_child() and sibling() to > resource_first_chils() and resource_sibling(). Dan suggested this. > > Move resource_first_chils() and resource_sibling() to linux/ioport.h > and make them as inline function. Rob suggested this. Accordingly add > linux/list.h including in linux/ioport.h, please help review if this > bring efficiency degradation or code redundancy. > > The change on struct resource {} bring two pointers of size increase, > mention this in git log to make it more specifically, Rob suggested > this. > > arch/microblaze/pci/pci-common.c | 37 ------------------------------------- > arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c | 35 ----------------------------------- > include/linux/ioport.h | 1 + > kernel/resource.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 4 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 72 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/microblaze/pci/pci-common.c b/arch/microblaze/pci/pci-common.c > index f34346d56095..7899bafab064 100644 > --- a/arch/microblaze/pci/pci-common.c > +++ b/arch/microblaze/pci/pci-common.c > @@ -619,43 +619,6 @@ int pcibios_add_device(struct pci_dev *dev) > EXPORT_SYMBOL(pcibios_add_device); > > /* > - * Reparent resource children of pr that conflict with res > - * under res, and make res replace those children. > - */ > -static int __init reparent_resources(struct resource *parent, > - struct resource *res) > -{ > - struct resource *p, **pp; > - struct resource **firstpp = NULL; > - > - for (pp = &parent->child; (p = *pp) != NULL; pp = &p->sibling) { > - if (p->end < res->start) > - continue; > - if (res->end < p->start) > - break; > - if (p->start < res->start || p->end > res->end) > - return -1; /* not completely contained */ > - if (firstpp == NULL) > - firstpp = pp; > - } > - if (firstpp == NULL) > - return -1; /* didn't find any conflicting entries? */ > - res->parent = parent; > - res->child = *firstpp; > - res->sibling = *pp; > - *firstpp = res; > - *pp = NULL; > - for (p = res->child; p != NULL; p = p->sibling) { > - p->parent = res; > - pr_debug("PCI: Reparented %s [%llx..%llx] under %s\n", > - p->name, > - (unsigned long long)p->start, > - (unsigned long long)p->end, res->name); > - } > - return 0; > -} > - > -/* > * Handle resources of PCI devices. If the world were perfect, we could > * just allocate all the resource regions and do nothing more. It isn't. > * On the other hand, we cannot just re-allocate all devices, as it would > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c > index fe9733ffffaa..926035bb378d 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c > @@ -1088,41 +1088,6 @@ resource_size_t pcibios_align_resource(void *data, const struct resource *res, > EXPORT_SYMBOL(pcibios_align_resource); > > /* > - * Reparent resource children of pr that conflict with res > - * under res, and make res replace those children. > - */ > -static int reparent_resources(struct resource *parent, > - struct resource *res) > -{ > - struct resource *p, **pp; > - struct resource **firstpp = NULL; > - > - for (pp = &parent->child; (p = *pp) != NULL; pp = &p->sibling) { > - if (p->end < res->start) > - continue; > - if (res->end < p->start) > - break; > - if (p->start < res->start || p->end > res->end) > - return -1; /* not completely contained */ > - if (firstpp == NULL) > - firstpp = pp; > - } > - if (firstpp == NULL) > - return -1; /* didn't find any conflicting entries? */ > - res->parent = parent; > - res->child = *firstpp; > - res->sibling = *pp; > - *firstpp = res; > - *pp = NULL; > - for (p = res->child; p != NULL; p = p->sibling) { > - p->parent = res; > - pr_debug("PCI: Reparented %s %pR under %s\n", > - p->name, p, res->name); > - } > - return 0; > -} > - > -/* > * Handle resources of PCI devices. If the world were perfect, we could > * just allocate all the resource regions and do nothing more. It isn't. > * On the other hand, we cannot just re-allocate all devices, as it would > diff --git a/include/linux/ioport.h b/include/linux/ioport.h > index da0ebaec25f0..dfdcd0bfe54e 100644 > --- a/include/linux/ioport.h > +++ b/include/linux/ioport.h > @@ -192,6 +192,7 @@ extern int allocate_resource(struct resource *root, struct resource *new, > struct resource *lookup_resource(struct resource *root, resource_size_t start); > int adjust_resource(struct resource *res, resource_size_t start, > resource_size_t size); > +int reparent_resources(struct resource *parent, struct resource *res); > resource_size_t resource_alignment(struct resource *res); > static inline resource_size_t resource_size(const struct resource *res) > { > diff --git a/kernel/resource.c b/kernel/resource.c > index 30e1bc68503b..5e7c56d5d838 100644 > --- a/kernel/resource.c > +++ b/kernel/resource.c > @@ -983,6 +983,42 @@ int adjust_resource(struct resource *res, resource_size_t start, > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL(adjust_resource); > > +/* > + * Reparent resource children of pr that conflict with res > + * under res, and make res replace those children. > + */ > +static int reparent_resources(struct resource *parent, > + struct resource *res) > +{ > + struct resource *p, **pp; > + struct resource **firstpp = NULL; > + > + for (pp = &parent->child; (p = *pp) != NULL; pp = &p->sibling) { > + if (p->end < res->start) > + continue; > + if (res->end < p->start) > + break; > + if (p->start < res->start || p->end > res->end) > + return -1; /* not completely contained */ > + if (firstpp == NULL) > + firstpp = pp; > + } > + if (firstpp == NULL) > + return -1; /* didn't find any conflicting entries? */ > + res->parent = parent; > + res->child = *firstpp; > + res->sibling = *pp; > + *firstpp = res; > + *pp = NULL; > + for (p = res->child; p != NULL; p = p->sibling) { > + p->parent = res; > + pr_debug("PCI: Reparented %s %pR under %s\n", > + p->name, p, res->name); > + } > + return 0; > +} > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(reparent_resources); > + > static void __init __reserve_region_with_split(struct resource *root, > resource_size_t start, resource_size_t end, > const char *name) > -- > 2.13.6 > _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec