Kexec Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Cc: dan.j.williams@intel.com, brijesh.singh@amd.com,
	Lianbo Jiang <lijiang@redhat.com>,
	bhe@redhat.com, thomas.lendacky@amd.com, tiwai@suse.de,
	x86@kernel.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com,
	baiyaowei@cmss.chinamobile.com, hpa@zytor.com,
	tglx@linutronix.de, dyoung@redhat.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] x86/kexec: Correct KEXEC_BACKUP_SRC_END off-by-one error
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2018 15:15:54 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180928131554.GC21895@zn.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <153805811578.1157.6948388946904655969.stgit@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com>

On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 09:21:55AM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> 
> The only use of KEXEC_BACKUP_SRC_END is as an argument to
> walk_system_ram_res():
> 
>   int crash_load_segments(struct kimage *image)
>   {
>     ...
>     walk_system_ram_res(KEXEC_BACKUP_SRC_START, KEXEC_BACKUP_SRC_END,
>                         image, determine_backup_region);
> 
> walk_system_ram_res() expects "start, end" arguments that are inclusive,
> i.e., the range to be walked includes both the start and end addresses.
> 
> KEXEC_BACKUP_SRC_END was previously defined as (640 * 1024UL), which is the
> first address *past* the desired 0-640KB range.
> 
> Define KEXEC_BACKUP_SRC_END as (640 * 1024UL - 1) so the KEXEC_BACKUP_SRC
> region is [0-0x9ffff], not [0-0xa0000].
> 
> Fixes: dd5f726076cc ("kexec: support for kexec on panic using new system call")
> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/include/asm/kexec.h |    2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kexec.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kexec.h
> index f327236f0fa7..5125fca472bb 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kexec.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kexec.h
> @@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ struct kimage;
>  
>  /* Memory to backup during crash kdump */
>  #define KEXEC_BACKUP_SRC_START	(0UL)
> -#define KEXEC_BACKUP_SRC_END	(640 * 1024UL)	/* 640K */
> +#define KEXEC_BACKUP_SRC_END	(640 * 1024UL - 1)	/* 640K */
>  
>  /*
>   * CPU does not save ss and sp on stack if execution is already

Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)

_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec

  reply	other threads:[~2018-09-28 13:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-09-27 14:21 [PATCH 0/3] find_next_iomem_res() fixes Bjorn Helgaas
2018-09-27 14:21 ` [PATCH 1/3] x86/kexec: Correct KEXEC_BACKUP_SRC_END off-by-one error Bjorn Helgaas
2018-09-28 13:15   ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2018-09-30  9:21   ` Dave Young
2018-09-30  9:27     ` Dave Young
2018-10-15  4:51       ` Dave Young
2018-10-15 11:18         ` Borislav Petkov
2018-10-15 13:44         ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-10-16  2:51           ` Dave Young
2018-09-27 14:22 ` [PATCH 2/3] resource: Include resource end in walk_*() interfaces Bjorn Helgaas
2018-09-28 13:54   ` Borislav Petkov
2018-09-27 14:22 ` [PATCH 3/3] resource: Fix find_next_iomem_res() iteration issue Bjorn Helgaas
2018-09-28 16:41   ` Borislav Petkov
2018-10-09 17:30     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-10-09 17:35       ` Borislav Petkov
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-09-24 22:14 [PATCH 0/3] find_next_iomem_res() fixes Bjorn Helgaas
2018-09-24 22:14 ` [PATCH 1/3] x86/kexec: Correct KEXEC_BACKUP_SRC_END off-by-one error Bjorn Helgaas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180928131554.GC21895@zn.tnic \
    --to=bp@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=baiyaowei@cmss.chinamobile.com \
    --cc=bhe@redhat.com \
    --cc=brijesh.singh@amd.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=lijiang@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
    --cc=tiwai@suse.de \
    --cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox