From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
ghook@redhat.com, brijesh.singh@amd.com,
Kairui Song <kasong@redhat.com>,
bhe@redhat.com, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
kexec@lists.infradead.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@microsoft.com>,
mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>,
dyoung@redhat.com
Subject: [PATCH 4.18 49/53] x86/boot: Fix kexec booting failure in the SEV bit detection code
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 19:54:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181018175425.011990285@linuxfoundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181018175416.561567978@linuxfoundation.org>
4.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Kairui Song <kasong@redhat.com>
[ Upstream commit bdec8d7fa55e6f5314ed72e5a0b435d90ff90548 ]
Commit
1958b5fc4010 ("x86/boot: Add early boot support when running with SEV active")
can occasionally cause system resets when kexec-ing a second kernel even
if SEV is not active.
That's because get_sev_encryption_bit() uses 32-bit rIP-relative
addressing to read the value of enc_bit - a variable which caches a
previously detected encryption bit position - but kexec may allocate
the early boot code to a higher location, beyond the 32-bit addressing
limit.
In this case, garbage will be read and get_sev_encryption_bit() will
return the wrong value, leading to accessing memory with the wrong
encryption setting.
Therefore, remove enc_bit, and thus get rid of the need to do 32-bit
rIP-relative addressing in the first place.
[ bp: massage commit message heavily. ]
Fixes: 1958b5fc4010 ("x86/boot: Add early boot support when running with SEV active")
Suggested-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de
Cc: mingo@redhat.com
Cc: hpa@zytor.com
Cc: brijesh.singh@amd.com
Cc: kexec@lists.infradead.org
Cc: dyoung@redhat.com
Cc: bhe@redhat.com
Cc: ghook@redhat.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180927123845.32052-1-kasong@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
arch/x86/boot/compressed/mem_encrypt.S | 19 -------------------
1 file changed, 19 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/mem_encrypt.S
+++ b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/mem_encrypt.S
@@ -25,20 +25,6 @@ ENTRY(get_sev_encryption_bit)
push %ebx
push %ecx
push %edx
- push %edi
-
- /*
- * RIP-relative addressing is needed to access the encryption bit
- * variable. Since we are running in 32-bit mode we need this call/pop
- * sequence to get the proper relative addressing.
- */
- call 1f
-1: popl %edi
- subl $1b, %edi
-
- movl enc_bit(%edi), %eax
- cmpl $0, %eax
- jge .Lsev_exit
/* Check if running under a hypervisor */
movl $1, %eax
@@ -69,15 +55,12 @@ ENTRY(get_sev_encryption_bit)
movl %ebx, %eax
andl $0x3f, %eax /* Return the encryption bit location */
- movl %eax, enc_bit(%edi)
jmp .Lsev_exit
.Lno_sev:
xor %eax, %eax
- movl %eax, enc_bit(%edi)
.Lsev_exit:
- pop %edi
pop %edx
pop %ecx
pop %ebx
@@ -113,8 +96,6 @@ ENTRY(set_sev_encryption_mask)
ENDPROC(set_sev_encryption_mask)
.data
-enc_bit:
- .int 0xffffffff
#ifdef CONFIG_AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT
.balign 8
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-18 17:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
[parent not found: <20181018175416.561567978@linuxfoundation.org>]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181018175425.011990285@linuxfoundation.org \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=alexander.levin@microsoft.com \
--cc=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=brijesh.singh@amd.com \
--cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
--cc=ghook@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kasong@redhat.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox