From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2019 13:29:10 +0100 From: Borislav Petkov Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/5] Documentation/arm64: Fix a simple typo in memory.rst Message-ID: <20191214122910.GD28635@zn.tnic> References: <1574972716-25858-1-git-send-email-bhsharma@redhat.com> <1574972716-25858-2-git-send-email-bhsharma@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1574972716-25858-2-git-send-email-bhsharma@redhat.com> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "kexec" Errors-To: kexec-bounces+dwmw2=infradead.org@lists.infradead.org To: Bhupesh Sharma Cc: Mark Rutland , Jonathan Corbet , Ard Biesheuvel , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Will Deacon , x86@kernel.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, James Morse , Catalin Marinas , bhupesh.linux@gmail.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Steve Capper On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 01:55:14AM +0530, Bhupesh Sharma wrote: > Fix a simple typo in arm64/memory.rst > > Cc: Jonathan Corbet > Cc: James Morse > Cc: Mark Rutland > Cc: Will Deacon > Cc: Steve Capper > Cc: Catalin Marinas > Cc: Ard Biesheuvel > Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org > Signed-off-by: Bhupesh Sharma > --- > Documentation/arm64/memory.rst | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/arm64/memory.rst b/Documentation/arm64/memory.rst > index 02e02175e6f5..cf03b3290800 100644 > --- a/Documentation/arm64/memory.rst > +++ b/Documentation/arm64/memory.rst > @@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ this logic. > > As a single binary will need to support both 48-bit and 52-bit VA > spaces, the VMEMMAP must be sized large enough for 52-bit VAs and > -also must be sized large enought to accommodate a fixed PAGE_OFFSET. > +also must be sized large enough to accommodate a fixed PAGE_OFFSET. > > Most code in the kernel should not need to consider the VA_BITS, for > code that does need to know the VA size the variables are > -- Why is this a separate patch? -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec